Buckley's final two examples, the florist and the baker, highlight the importance of personal choice in economic transactions and the right to refuse service based on individual beliefs. He argues that individuals should have the freedom to decline business that goes against their conscience. Whether one agrees with Buckley's conclusion often depends on their perspective on the balance between personal beliefs and anti-discrimination principles in the marketplace.
You would have to demonstrate that there is a connection - which I dispute that there is. Thus, my conlusion is that there is no connection.
blah
non ya
Don't!
Freud's theory of the Oedipus complex might explain Hamlet's behavior.
C. Wright Mills
The connection between households and firms in the economy stems from the fact that consumers in this case households work for firms to earn wages as the company makes profits due to increased production.
An inference is a conclusion drawn from evidence. The logical connection is clear. An opinion need not be based on evidence, or if it is, may not flow from it logically.
difference between abstract and conclusion
Logic is one method of reasoning. For examples of illogical reasoning, search for "Charlie Sheen".
Yes there is a possible connection
A hypothesis is a suggestion of a way to explain something. If the hypothesis is tested and confirmed, it can advance to the status of theory. The conclusion of testing a hypothesis will be either that the hypothesis is confirmed, or it is not confirmed.