0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who could refuse to approve actions of the senate that were not in the best interest of the roman empire?
It was the tribunes who could veto the actions of the senate (or any other magistrate except a dictator) if they were not in the best interests of the people.
He declared himself dictator?
No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.No one declared himself dictator. The office of dictator could only be granted by the senate.
Could a dictator's proposals be vetoed by the senet?
No, a dictator's proposals were supreme and could not be vetoed by anyone.No, a dictator's proposals were supreme and could not be vetoed by anyone.No, a dictator's proposals were supreme and could not be vetoed by anyone.No, a dictator's proposals were supreme and could not be vetoed by anyone.No, a dictator's proposals were supreme and could not be vetoed by anyone.No, a dictator's proposals were supreme and could not be vetoed by anyone.No, a dictator's proposals were supreme and could not be vetoed by anyone.No, a dictator's proposals were supreme and could not be vetoed by anyone.No, a dictator's proposals were supreme and could not be vetoed by anyone.
A sentence with the word impunity in it?
The dictator ruled with impunity, knowing that he would not be held accountable for his actions.
Which of the following could be considered a primary primary function of an epic?
show the ideals of a culture through the actions of a hero
Who made himself dictator in anicent rome?
No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.No one. No one could make himself dictator in ancient Rome. The office of dictator was granted to a man by the senate. It was a legitimate political position under the Roman republic.
How many dictators were there at any time in the roman senate?
Although there were many dictators over the length of the Roman republic, there could only be one dictator at a time.Although there were many dictators over the length of the Roman republic, there could only be one dictator at a time.Although there were many dictators over the length of the Roman republic, there could only be one dictator at a time.Although there were many dictators over the length of the Roman republic, there could only be one dictator at a time.Although there were many dictators over the length of the Roman republic, there could only be one dictator at a time.Although there were many dictators over the length of the Roman republic, there could only be one dictator at a time.Although there were many dictators over the length of the Roman republic, there could only be one dictator at a time.Although there were many dictators over the length of the Roman republic, there could only be one dictator at a time.Although there were many dictators over the length of the Roman republic, there could only be one dictator at a time.
Who declared them self dictator in rome?
No one could declare himself a dictator in ancient Rome. A dictator was appointed by the senate.No one could declare himself a dictator in ancient Rome. A dictator was appointed by the senate.No one could declare himself a dictator in ancient Rome. A dictator was appointed by the senate.No one could declare himself a dictator in ancient Rome. A dictator was appointed by the senate.No one could declare himself a dictator in ancient Rome. A dictator was appointed by the senate.No one could declare himself a dictator in ancient Rome. A dictator was appointed by the senate.No one could declare himself a dictator in ancient Rome. A dictator was appointed by the senate.No one could declare himself a dictator in ancient Rome. A dictator was appointed by the senate.No one could declare himself a dictator in ancient Rome. A dictator was appointed by the senate.
A Roman military dictator?
Any Roman dictator could be considered a military dictator. Dictators were only appointed in times of crises and most crises were due to war/invasion. Cincinnatus, Sulla, Caesar and anyone in between could be considered military dictators.Any Roman dictator could be considered a military dictator. Dictators were only appointed in times of crises and most crises were due to war/invasion. Cincinnatus, Sulla, Caesar and anyone in between could be considered military dictators.Any Roman dictator could be considered a military dictator. Dictators were only appointed in times of crises and most crises were due to war/invasion. Cincinnatus, Sulla, Caesar and anyone in between could be considered military dictators.Any Roman dictator could be considered a military dictator. Dictators were only appointed in times of crises and most crises were due to war/invasion. Cincinnatus, Sulla, Caesar and anyone in between could be considered military dictators.Any Roman dictator could be considered a military dictator. Dictators were only appointed in times of crises and most crises were due to war/invasion. Cincinnatus, Sulla, Caesar and anyone in between could be considered military dictators.Any Roman dictator could be considered a military dictator. Dictators were only appointed in times of crises and most crises were due to war/invasion. Cincinnatus, Sulla, Caesar and anyone in between could be considered military dictators.Any Roman dictator could be considered a military dictator. Dictators were only appointed in times of crises and most crises were due to war/invasion. Cincinnatus, Sulla, Caesar and anyone in between could be considered military dictators.Any Roman dictator could be considered a military dictator. Dictators were only appointed in times of crises and most crises were due to war/invasion. Cincinnatus, Sulla, Caesar and anyone in between could be considered military dictators.Any Roman dictator could be considered a military dictator. Dictators were only appointed in times of crises and most crises were due to war/invasion. Cincinnatus, Sulla, Caesar and anyone in between could be considered military dictators.
Was the dictator included in the roman monarchy?
No, although a king could be considered a dictator of sorts. The office of dictator in ancient Rome was a republican office which was bestowed upon certain men in times of crises with the agreement of the senate.No, although a king could be considered a dictator of sorts. The office of dictator in ancient Rome was a republican office which was bestowed upon certain men in times of crises with the agreement of the senate.No, although a king could be considered a dictator of sorts. The office of dictator in ancient Rome was a republican office which was bestowed upon certain men in times of crises with the agreement of the senate.No, although a king could be considered a dictator of sorts. The office of dictator in ancient Rome was a republican office which was bestowed upon certain men in times of crises with the agreement of the senate.No, although a king could be considered a dictator of sorts. The office of dictator in ancient Rome was a republican office which was bestowed upon certain men in times of crises with the agreement of the senate.No, although a king could be considered a dictator of sorts. The office of dictator in ancient Rome was a republican office which was bestowed upon certain men in times of crises with the agreement of the senate.No, although a king could be considered a dictator of sorts. The office of dictator in ancient Rome was a republican office which was bestowed upon certain men in times of crises with the agreement of the senate.No, although a king could be considered a dictator of sorts. The office of dictator in ancient Rome was a republican office which was bestowed upon certain men in times of crises with the agreement of the senate.No, although a king could be considered a dictator of sorts. The office of dictator in ancient Rome was a republican office which was bestowed upon certain men in times of crises with the agreement of the senate.
What is the role of a dictator during the Roman Republic?
A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.
How long was the term of a dictator?
The term of office for a Roman dictator was supposed to be six months, but it could be renewed if the dictator had not finished his job in that length of time. However it was expected that a dictator would resign the office once he had finished the job even though his sis month term had not expired.
