answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Landowners might prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a permanent labor force that could provide long-term economic benefits. Slaves were considered property that could be bought, sold, and inherited, providing a sense of control and ownership that was not possible with indentured servants who had fixed terms of service. Additionally, the institution of slavery allowed landowners to exploit and profit from free labor without having to worry about wages, contracts, or the expiration of servitude.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2w ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: A reason why landowners would have slaves rather than indented servants?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Law

What is a reason landowners would rather have slaves then indentured slaves?

Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property and have lifelong servitude, while indentured servants have a set period of servitude and can demand compensation or freedom after their term is complete. This gives landowners more control and long-term labor security with slaves.


What these is a reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?

Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property with no time limit on their labor, while indentured servants have a set term of service and can negotiate for their rights. Slaves also provide a more stable and long-term workforce compared to indentured servants who may leave once their contract is fulfilled. Additionally, slaves can be seen as a permanent source of labor that can be inherited and passed down through generations.


Which of these is a good reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?

Landowners would prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a permanent source of labor without a time limit on their service, while indentured servants had contracts that ended after a specific period. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing the landowner with greater control. Additionally, the system of slavery was based on race and allowed for the perpetuation of wealth and power within a specific group.


How were immigrants similar to indentured servants?

Both immigrants and indentured servants arrived in a new country seeking better opportunities and were often subject to poor living conditions and mistreatment. They both faced challenges adapting to a new culture and were vulnerable to exploitation by employers or landowners.


What was the most basic reason the South needed a cheap form of labor like sharecropping?

The South needed a cheap form of labor like sharecropping because they faced labor shortages after the abolition of slavery. Sharecropping allowed landowners to retain control over agricultural production while providing former slaves and poor whites with a means of livelihood, albeit in a system that often exploited them economically.

Related questions

What is a reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants.?

Since slavery was for life, I slave provided more years of work. Apex


What is a reason landowners would rather have slaves then indentured slaves?

Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property and have lifelong servitude, while indentured servants have a set period of servitude and can demand compensation or freedom after their term is complete. This gives landowners more control and long-term labor security with slaves.


What these is a reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?

Landowners may prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves are considered property with no time limit on their labor, while indentured servants have a set term of service and can negotiate for their rights. Slaves also provide a more stable and long-term workforce compared to indentured servants who may leave once their contract is fulfilled. Additionally, slaves can be seen as a permanent source of labor that can be inherited and passed down through generations.


Which of these is a good reason landowners would rather have slaves than indentured servants?

Landowners would prefer slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a permanent source of labor without a time limit on their service, while indentured servants had contracts that ended after a specific period. Slaves were also considered property that could be bought and sold, providing the landowner with greater control. Additionally, the system of slavery was based on race and allowed for the perpetuation of wealth and power within a specific group.


Which of these is a reason plantation owners preferred to have slaves rather then indentured servants?

Plantation owners preferred slaves over indentured servants because slaves were seen as a long-term and inheritable source of labor, providing more stability and control over their workforce. Additionally, slaves did not have the legal protections and rights that indentured servants possessed, making them easier to exploit and control. Finally, the racial hierarchy and beliefs of the time perpetuated the notion that Africans and their descendants were inferior and thus suitable for enslavement.


How were immigrants similar to indentured servants?

Both immigrants and indentured servants arrived in a new country seeking better opportunities and were often subject to poor living conditions and mistreatment. They both faced challenges adapting to a new culture and were vulnerable to exploitation by employers or landowners.


Why do you think there was a lack of servants?

The reason there may have been a lack of servants is because people started becoming educated. As they became more educated, they found better jobs.


The main reason that the suitors and servants don't recognize Odysseus when he first appaers is that?

is bcs he was in discise as a beggar DU!!


What is the reason plantation owners preferred to have slaves rather than indentured servants?

Slaves were owned as property, but indentured servants were white people who signed a 7 year contract for transportation to the colonies. They could also blend in with the population while anyone who was black was a slave.


Why did colonial masters first adopt the institution of indentured servitude rather than Indian or black slavery?

Early on, there was a steady stream of white, indentured servants coming from England to the New World. Many were promised land after completing their services and were therefore eager to work. The main reason colonial masters opted for this option was because these indentured servants were much cheaper than African and Indian slaves. After Bacon's rebellion however, and after an economic upturn in England which kept laborers home, indentured servants became a less desirable option. At this point, the slave trade had opened up and indentured servants were seen as too difficult to control.


What was the reason landowners would rather have slaves than servants?

Landowners preferred slaves over servants because slaves were considered property that could be bought and sold, giving landowners more control and ownership over them. Slaves had no legal rights and were seen as a lifelong investment, whereas servants had the potential to negotiate their terms of service and had legal protections. Additionally, owning slaves meant that landowners did not have to pay wages or provide benefits, making it more economically advantageous for them.


What was the reason Sir Edwin Sandy's wanted more women to come to Jamestown as indentured servants?

men will work harder if they had their familys