Nobody is liable for an act of nature.
Your own comprehensive auto insurance would provide coverage for damage to your vehicle from an act of nature.
No one is liable for an act of nature Presumably, The tenant signed a lease agreement. Most landlords specify in the lease agreement that the tenant purchase there own insurance to cover the tenants and the landlords interest in the property being leased. This clarifies for the tenant that they are responsible for their own property as well as liable for any un-repaired damages to the owners property.
That would depend on who's angry wife your talking about. If the tenants wife damages your property or your landlords property then the tenants wife is liable for those damages. Due to the extension of common law you can also be held financially liable for actions of your spouse. The landlord would have no control over the tenants wife nor her actions and could not be held liable. If the Landlords wife came over and damaged your property or the landlords property then the Landlord and or the landlord wife would be financially liable.
It depends on the circumstances and local laws. Generally, if your neighbor's property causes damage to your property due to negligence or failure to maintain their property, they may be liable for the damage. It is advisable to consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and options in this situation.
Mother Nature would be the liable party, Unfortunately, she does not carry insurance. If your property is insured, Then your property Insurance Policy will cover the cost of damage repairs.
Not sure what the question is here but you are liable for the damage if these sons are under 18 otherwise they are liable.
You are civilly liable for the damage of property or injury sustained by another while on your property with ot withour your permission, provided it is not posted No Trespassing, AND you have reported that person previously for violating the posting.That being said, if you purposefully scattered the screws in your driveway for any reason, but especially in an attempt to hinder repossession of a vehicle, you could be, and should be criminally charged for malicious destruction of property and attempted assault at minimum.
owener of property tree is on The owner of the property where the tree is on.
The At-Fault motorist (via their insurance) is liable for damage to property.
You will be liable for the difference.
It depends, so here are some scenerios: If there are several cars parked in a private driveway and you back-up or start speeding out of the driveway and hit another car then you are responsible for hitting the other car. If you were speeding on a road and turned a curve and ended up on someone's property you are responsible for the damage done on their property and that includes ripping up gardens, grass, crashing into any part of that home or uprooting trees. If you were on private property and someone else hit you causing you to damage that property then it would be the other person that is responsible.
It would be an auto claim for the damage to the other and a homeowners claim for the damage to your property. You cannot be liable to yourself, so you cannot claim the property damage on your auto policy.
If the injury and property damage is to that of another for which you are at fault "Legally Liable" then yes. If the injury is to the insured(s) yourself or your own property then no. it is not possible to be liable to ones own self.