Secure group communication in mobile ad hoc networks is often dynamic and impromptu, and thus re-
quires efficient and automated secure group management and seamless combination of secure groups with
distributed applications running upon them. CRTDH sceme by Balachandran et. al. [75] has been proposed
in 2005. This scheme has been used in later access control frameworks like in [76]. The scheme considers the
Chinese Remainder Theorem and Diffie-Hellman Key exchange to achieve distributed key-management for
SGC in wireless ad hoc networks. Assuming a group of n users, U1;U2; :::Un has to be formed, the following
operations are performed by each member Ui (where i = 1; 2; :::n) to obtain the shared group key.
Ui selects the Diffie-Hellman private share xi and broadcasts the public share yi = gximodp. Ui then
receives the public shares from all other members in the group and computes the DH key shared with each
of them. as mij = yxi
i mod p, where j = 1; :::; i 1; i + 1; :::n and j = i. Least Common Multiple (LCM)
of all the DH keys calculated is noted as lcmi. Ui then randomly selects ki, such that ki < min(mij ; 8j),
which will be its share of the group key. Ui also selects an arbitrary number D such that D = ki and another
number Dp such that the gcd(Dp; lcmi) = 1. Each member then solves the CRT
crti = ki mod lcmi
crti = D mod Dp
and broadcasts it to the group. After Ui receives the crt values from all the other members in the group and
calculate kj = crtj mod mij , for all j = i and compute the group key GK = k1 k2 :::kn As can be seen
from the above steps, the Chinese Remainder Theorem is used to send each member's key share (disguised)
to all the other members in the group. The Difie-Hellman key exchange is performed to derive the modulo
value in the CRT calculation. To understand the details of the scheme, let us consider a member U1 in a
group of 4 members. The first two steps of the protocol involve the generation and distribution of the DH
public share by each member in the group. U1 selects a DH private share x1 and computes its DH public share y1 = gx1 mod p. U1 then broadcasts the DH public share y1 to all the other members in the group. In
Step 3 of the protocol, all the mij values are generated, which are nothing but the DH keys shared between
U1 and the other members. U1 calculates three m values m12;m13;m14 which are equal to yx12; yx13; yx14
respectively. y2; y3; y4 are the DH public shares of members U2;U3;U4 broadcasted in Step 2. The three DH
keys (m12;m13;m14) generated by U1 are equal to m21;m31;m41 generated by U2;U3;U4 respectively. U1
then calculates the LCM of the DH keys m12;m13andm14. This LCM value will be later used for the CRT
calculation in Step 6. Step 5 of the protocol involves the generation of a random key share k1 by U1. This
k1 share has to be less than all DH keys m1;m2andm3 and the lcm1 value since we want the other members
to obtain k1 and not k1(modmij) or k1(modlcm1) respectively. In the next step, U1 generates an arbitrary
number D and Dp which will be used in solving the CRT. The Dp value should be selected such that Dp
and lcmi are co-primes, in order to solve the CRT. Also, the number D should not be equal to k1, since if
they are, then the solution to the CRT will be equal to the group key, k1. After solving the CRT in Step 6,
the solution is broadcasted to the group in Step 7. U1 solves the CRT to obtain crt1 and broadcasts it to
the the group. U1 also receives the CRT values crt2; crt3; crt4 from the other members in the group. U1 can
obtain k2; k3; k4 by performing the following operations.
k2 = crt2( mod m12)
k3 = crt3( mod m13)
k4 = crt4( mod m14).
The individual ki shares are then XOR-ed to obtain the group key GK. Similarly all the members in the group arrive at the same group key, since the following holds kj = crtj mod LCMj = crtj mod mij. Any member,
such as Ui, receives the (broadcast) values crt1 from U1; :::; crti 1 from Ui 1; crti + 1from Ui + 1; :::;and
crtn from Un. Ui can then compute k1; :::; ki 1; ki+1; :::and kn using m(i; 1); :::;m(i; i 1);m(i; i+1); ::: and
m(i; n) respectively. Along with its own ki;Ui has all the elements for computing the group key. As a result,
all the members will compute the same key.
The difference is a sensor network may be connected using wires or wirelessly, a wireless sensor network is always connected wirelessly.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/3101991/Distributed-wormhole-attack-detection-in-wireless-sensor-networks
There are dozens of sensor that have to do with engine management and ignition all over the engine.There are dozens of sensor that have to do with engine management and ignition all over the engine.
Where is the engine management and ignition sensor on a 1999 plymouth voyager?
One of the biggest disadvantages of large scale wireless sensor networks is the fact that they are vulnerable to unauthorized access. Also it relies on the complexity of logistics involving selective replacement of sensors.
E. Cayirci has written: 'Security in wireless ad hoc and sensor networks' -- subject(s): Ad hoc networks (Computer networks), Security measures
basically sensorless scheme estimated the speed using current signal or current sensor without considerartion speed sensor thats reduce the cost of machine and make it more efficient ..basically sensorless scheme can uses sensor only at current signal or sensor at dc link in doubly fed machine,.........................
wireless sensor networks
Wireless sensor networks are capable of measuring certain aspects of a physical environment. For example, there are sensors available the measure temperature, pressure, and more.
There are a number of places where one can go to find images of wireless sensor networks, particularly online. There are a number of picture hosting websites, and most search pages, like Google, offer an image search.
Sensor network comprises of scattered sensor nodes with limited computational capabilities and battery power. The existing security solutions for traditional wireless networks can not be used because of the constraints associated with sensor network. We present secure sink node architecture as two-tiered scheme for sensor network security. The architecture protects the sink node from unauthorized access by surrounding it with two protection layers. Sink nodes listen to only inner layer nodes and inner nodes are allowed to communicate with only outer layer nodes. These protection layers are formed in an intelligent manner without violating constraints specific to sensor network. In order to enhance security, protection layers are re-adjusted in case of an attack. We present statistical analysis to elucidate the performance of proposed architecture.
A Wireless sensor network, according to UbiBot, is a collection of devices that can exchange data gathered from a monitored field using wireless networks. The data is routed across numerous nodes and connects to other networks via a gateway, such as wireless Ethernet.