0
No. It can never be "proven" true. It's always open to question, and to any demonstration of its failure.
But after time goes by, and no evidence has been presented to demonstrate that the hypothesis fails, and the hypothesis has made predictions that were confirmed by experiments designed to test them, then the hypothesis may be elevated to the status of a theory. But it's still waiting to be debunked.
Interesting that a theory can be dis-proven in a day, but can't be proven in a thousand years. That's Science.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which of the following implies that an idea is absolutely true?
Which of the following implies that an idea is absolutely true? belief hypothesis theory law
Why do scientists make hypotheses?
A hypothesis is an untested educated guess of an experiment's eventual outcome. The reason scientists make hypotheses is first from curiosity. From this hypothesis, a controlled experiment can be constructed, tested and observed to achieve a result which either supports the hypothesis or disproves it, creating a theory.
What is the best way to prove Aristotle's theory of when a plant grows all material comes from soil to be incorrect or correct?
What you are calling a theory is based on a single testable observation. That makes it an hypothesis. A theory wants to collect up a variety of related hypotheses and derive a grand answer to why a system works the way it does.An hypothesis must be testable by empirical means and it must be provable false. If you fail to prove it false, you can accept it. That doesn't make it true, though.Now that we've reduced Aristotle's contention to an hypothesis, you must recognize that an hypothesis can never proven true. You can only support it. You can prove the hypothesis "A plant gains weight by obtaining material from the soil." false. if you weigh the dry soil before and after and find that the weight didn't change, the hypothesis is false.If the weight after was the same, you might postulate that the plant is getting its mass from the air and the water (new hypothesis). If you repeat the experiment a number of times and it always results in the same result, that gives greater support but it never makes it true.
Is Alfred Wegener's hypothesis true about continental drift?
Yes and no. His hypothesis about how the plates were moved eventually was proven wrong, although his hypothesis that the plates had shifted in position over time was proven. The physical evidence in support of continental drift (now referred to as the theory of plate tectonics) began to be considered overwhelming back in the 1960s, with the discovery of the mid-ocean ridges and the accompanying paleomagnetic striping along the sea floor which has recorded magnetic reversals in newly formed crustal rock. More recently, we have measured the rates of motion of each of the continental plates using GPS satellite technology. The fact the plates drift is now indisputable.
What is the name of the theory that led to the development of the theory of plate tectonics?
Plate tectonics is the combination of the seafloor spreading and continental drift. When Alfred Wegner described this process it was rejected due to lack of evidence. Since, we have discovered new evidence and proven his theory true.
True or false A theory is a hypothesis that has been proven true?
false
A hypothesis becomes a theory suitable as the basis of a persuasive argument only after it has been?
tested and proven to be true
What is a supporting hypothesis?
A well-supported hypothesis is a theory that appears to have a lot of evidence behind it. This evidence helps to make it seem likely that the hypothesis is true, but it is still just a theory until it has been proven.
Why is a scientific law called a law?
A scientific law is one that has been tested throughout hypothesis and theory and proven to be true all the time.
Why don't scientist say they have proven their hypothesis true?
Unlike religion, science need objective and strong evidence before giving credit to a theory as explanation of something. And anything that has been proven "true" can always be proven wrong by any other new theory which fits better or simoly be proven wrong.
How does hypothesis become a law or principle?
Look up the definition of an "hypothesis" and look up the definition of a "law." Now look at hypotheses are tested. Can a theory ever become law? What are the limiting factors of an hypothesis versus the limitations of a law, and how are each established? Answer those questions, and you will find your answer.
Explain the difference between a hypothesis and a theory?
A very complicated question but to pare it down: An hypothesis is a preliminary answer to a scientific question but is one which needs testing. A theory is an hypothesis that has withstood numerous tests and has not failed.
Why don't scientists say they have proven their hypothesis true?
Unlike religion, science need objective and strong evidence before giving credit to a theory as explanation of something. And anything that has been proven "true" can always be proven wrong by any other new theory which fits better or simoly be proven wrong.
What is the difference between hypothesis and law?
A hypothesis is what someone suggests could be true, and then tests it to see whether or not it is true. A law is what has been proven to be true.
What is a hypothesis that has been tested many times and found to be true?
If a hypothesis has been tested many times (using approved experimental methods), and each test has proven the hypothesis to be true, the hypothesis can be taken to be a fact, or truth.
Is a well-tested and widely accepted view that best explains certain scientific observations?
A well-supported hypothesis is a theory that appears to have a lot of evidence behind it. This evidence helps to make it seem likely that the hypothesis is true, but it is still just a theory until it has been proven.
Does a theory have to be true all the time?
Not at all. That it hasn't been proven is what makes it a theory. Once proven, it becomes a law.
