0
natural laws ~ reference my social studies book over Philosophy in the Age of Reason
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How did hobbes think differently about human nature from Locke?
Hobbes believed that humans are inherently self-interested and driven by a desire for power and survival. He thought humans were naturally in a state of conflict and chaos, leading to the need for a strong central authority to maintain order. Locke, on the other hand, believed that humans are born as blank slates, with the potential for reason and cooperation, and that they have natural rights to life, liberty, and property.
How do hobbes Locke and Rousseau understand the state of nature and social contract differently?
Because Hobbes Locke and Rousseau likes to watch Avatar.
How do Hobbes Locke and Rousseau understand the state of nature and the social contract differently?
Hobbes believed the state of nature to be a state of war and chaos, where life is "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short." He saw the social contract as necessary to establish a sovereign authority to maintain order. Locke viewed the state of nature more positively, as a state of natural rights and freedom, and believed the social contract existed to protect these rights. Rousseau saw the state of nature as peaceful and harmonious, with the social contract as a means to protect individual liberties while promoting the common good.
What English philosopher who called for consent of the governed?
John Locke is the English philosopher who is known for advocating for the consent of the governed as the foundation for legitimate government. In his writings, particularly in his Two Treatises of Government, Locke argued that individuals have the right to consent to their rulers and that government's legitimacy is derived from the consent of the governed.
Which of he following statements is about thomas hobbes and john Locke is not correct?
"Thomas Hobbes believed that people are inherently good and can be trusted, while John Locke believed in the concept of the social contract and the idea of natural rights." This statement is incorrect because it switches the beliefs of Hobbes and Locke. Hobbes actually believed in the inherent selfishness and competitiveness of human nature, while Locke emphasized the importance of natural rights and the consent of the governed in a social contract.
How should a land be governed?
according to locke how should a land be governed and why is it the case
What did hobbes and Locke agree and disagree about with regard to government?
Hobbes and Locke both agreed that government is necessary to maintain order and protect people's rights. However, they disagreed on the nature of government. Hobbes believed in a strong, centralized government to prevent chaos, while Locke advocated for a limited government with power derived from the consent of the governed.
Social Contract Theory was advocated by?
Hobbes, Locke Rousseau
Hobbes and Locke?
Two fameous philosophers. To make a long story short, Locke-People are good Hobbes-People are bad
Was Hobbes pessimistic or optimistic view?
Hobbes had a pessimistic view of human nature, believing that people were naturally self-interested, driven by a desire for power and survival. He argued that without a strong central authority to maintain order, society would descend into a state of constant conflict and chaos.
How did Thomas Hobbes and John Locke differ in their views of the role of government?
Thomas Hobbes and john Locke had very different views of human nature. The basic difference between the two of them is that Hobbes had a rather negative view of human nature while Locke had a much more positive view of human nature. You can see this difference in the kinds of political systems they each advocated. Hobbes, thought that only a monarch, a "leviathan" of a power, could keep people in check due to their inherent badness. By contrast, Locke thought that people were good enough to be able to govern themselves. He thought that the people were good enough that they would be able to set up representative governments that would maintain a stable society
How did thomas hobbes and john Locke differ in their views on the role of government?
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke had very different views of human nature. The basic difference between the two of them is that Hobbes had a rather negative view of human nature while Locke had a much more positive view of human nature. You can see this difference in the kinds of political systems they each advocated. Hobbes, thought that only a monarch, a "leviathan" of a power, could keep people in check due to their inherent badness. By contrast, Locke thought that people were good enough to be able to govern themselves. He thought that the people were good enough that they would be able to set up representative governments that would maintain a stable society
