Want this question answered?
the national government would be to strong
the national government would be to strong
antifederalists :)
The antifederalists, or people who opposed a strong federal government, came into quarrel with the federalists, who favored a strong federal government. The federalists differ from the anti-federalists in terms of social, economic, and political expression. Many differences arose between the federalists and the antifederalists concerning social issues. First of all, the antifederalists were from the poorer classes, while the federalists were from higher, more aristocratic classes. Antifederalists mainly consisted of uneducated people who made up the working class. Federalists, however, were aristocratic people who were cultured and well educated.
it created a strong central government
The federalists got a strong government by passing a Constitution that contained one. The Bill of Rights were a result of continuing discussion with antifederalists.
The anti-federalists were the opponents of ratifying the U.S. Constitution, because it would create a strong central government. Some of the noted anti-federalists were Patrick Henry, George Clinton and James Monroe.
The Federalists supported strong federal/central government, while the antifederalists wanted strong state government.
The Federalists supported a strong national government.
they thought that state government should be more powerful than national gov.
To create a strong national government. A+LS
the lack of a strong national government is the people behind the government helping the government pass all the test to become a national government on its own.