0
Are Supreme Court Justices under the control of the President who appoints them?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
No- the justices act independently once they take office. They are appointed for life and so are immune from political pressure. Although presidents try to select nominees that agree with their own constitutional philosophies, there are no guarantees.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What does the president do in the US do?
He suggests laws for Congress to pass, appoints Supreme Court judges, serves as head of the armed forces, takes part in diplomacy and represents the nation. What the President cannot do is pass laws, control the money or breach the Constitution.
What check on power does the president have on congress?
The President, or the "Executive Branch", as its called, proposes laws - which Congress (the "Legislative Branch") then can either act on or ignore. Its the Supreme Court (the "Judicial Branch") that acts to 'check' the powers of Congress, by the ability to overturn laws that are unconstitutional. The President nominates Supreme Court justices, who then have to be approved by the Senate, so its a big circular power exchange.... The Executive Branch has a number of ways to control the powers of Congress. There is the Presidential veto. There is the appointment of judges and other Federal officers.
Can Supreme Court be dissolved?
No. Article III of the Constitution requires the federal government to establish and maintain a Supreme Court, and prevents Congress from removing individual justices except by impeachment. Congress has some control over the structure of all the federal courts, but it doesn't have the power to dissolve the US Supreme Court.
How does the Legislative Branch check the power of the Executive Branch?
The Legislative Branch has the power:of impeachmentto override presidential vetoesto reject presidential appointmentsto reject treatiesto withhold funding for initiativesThe three branches are based on a separation of power controlled by a system of checks and balances. Congress can pass a bill vetoed by the President if they have a 2/3's majority and they appoint members of the Executive Branch. The Legislative Branch also ratify treaties, impeach, make laws, investigate, declare war and control all the money.
What does the Manager of the Economy do?
The president has no formal power over the economy. However, the president does work with Congress to write a federal budget and set tax policy. The president also appoints members of the Federal Reserve Board, which works to control the money supply and keep the economy growing at a sustainable pace.
Are US Supreme Court justices free from control once appointed?
That depends on what you mean by "control."The Judicial branch is independent of the Legislative and Executive branches, and the justices are free to exercise jurisprudence without interference from the other two parts of government. That is part of the Constitution's "separate powers" that form the foundation of the United States' system of checks and balances.Congress and the President also exercise checks and balances against the Supreme Court. For example:Congressional Checks on the JudiciarySenate approves federal judges and Supreme Court justicesImpeachment power (House)Trial of impeachments (Senate)Power to initiate constitutional amendmentsPower to create courts and tribunals inferior to the Supreme CourtPower to set jurisdiction of courts (some jurisdictional changes for the Supreme Court, only by Amendment)Power to change the size of the Supreme CourtPresidential Checks on the JudiciaryPower to appoint judges and justicesAbility to pardonIn addition, Article III of the Constitution specifies that the justices "hold their offices during good behaviour," which means they're held to high legal, ethical and personal standards. If a justice commits a crime, is involved in a scandal, or behaves in any way considered unethical, he or she is subject to impeachment and removal from office.
What was the Act that created new Circuit Courts when Adams was President?
The Judiciary Act of 1801, passed February 13, 1801, realigned the judicial districts and created six circuits and five new district courts, ostensibly to relieve the Supreme Court justices of their circuit-riding responsibilities. The Act also reduced the number of Supreme Court justices from six to five, by attrition.The real reason the Federalist President and Congress rushed the Judiciary Act through during the lame duck session was to pack the Judicial Branch with as many Federalist as possible before Adams' presidential successor, Thomas Jefferson, took office. Adams recognized the Federalists were losing power in government and sought to assert control over the court system in order to retain political influence.Jefferson and the Democratic-Republican-dominated Congress foiled Adams' plan by passing the Repeal Act of 1802, which eliminated all the new courts (along with their Federalist judges), reinstated the size of the Supreme Court to six, and forced the Supreme Court justices to continue riding circuit.
How could the powers be checked by one of the other branches?
The president can veto bills passed by Congress. Congress can override a presidential veto. The president nominates Supreme Court Justices. The Supreme Court can rule laws passed by Congress unconstitutional. The Congress must approve Court appointments and treaties signed by the president. Congress can impeach and try the president. Each branch of the United States government has an equal amount of power. Congress has the power to make laws (legislative branch). However the president has the power to veto the laws made by Congress (executive branch). Then so the president doesnt have complete control over the law's fate Congress can veto the president's veto with a mandatory two thirds vote to over turn the presidents veto. Finally the Supreme Court makes the decision of whether the law is constitutional or not. Should they find it unconstitutional they can scrap it or send it back to Congress. This is known as the system of checks and balances.
How does the Supreme Court judicial review to control the power of congress and the president?
It evaluates laws, executive orders, and policies and makes sure they're constitutional.
Why does the President appoint US Supreme Court justices?
Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the US Constitution assigns the President power to nominate a Supreme Court justice with the "advice and consent" of the Senate. Appointment to the Court is a shared power, not the President's alone.Although the Framers didn't explain their reasons for establishing this particular system, political expedience undoubtedly played a role. One person (the President), representing a single party (but mindful of the other party's political power), can make an informed choice fairly quickly. The Senate, on the other hand, with two parties fighting for control, could get bogged down in partisan politics and drag out selection for a long time.If the Senate only has one person to evaluate, their role becomes much simpler: investigate, evaluate, appoint or reject. This is a dramatic oversimplification of the appointment process, but the general reasoning seems sound.The shared power between Executive and Legislative branches is part of the US government's system of checks and balances that helps ensure no single branch becomes too powerful.Article II, Section 2, Clause 2"[The President] shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States, whose appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by law: but the Congress may by law vest the appointment of such inferior officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the courts of law, or in the heads of departments."
What did the dissenting justices think about the power of the military authorities?
There are no dissenting judges as to the power of the American military. From the president being the commander-in-Chief to the Congress controlling the budget and funding, the military is subject to civilian control.
Why doesn't the US President have the authority to reverse a Supreme Court decision?
The President (Executive Branch) doesn't have the authority to reverse a Supreme Court (Judicial Branch) decision because such action would violate the separation of powers established by the Constitution. If the President had that kind of "veto authority" over a Supreme Court decision he (or she) would effectively control two branches of the government and would be vested with too much power.
