0
A valid argument is certainly stronger than an invalid argument. but an argument can be valid and still be relatively weak. Validity and strength are not the same, although they are both good features for an argument to have.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is a valid argument strong or weak?
Valid arguments must include facts and supporting documentation in order to strengthen the validity. If not, then the argument can be challenged.
What are opposite word for weak?
antonym comes from the greek, anti, meaning opposite, so the opposite of weak is strong.
What is a weak syllable and a strong syllable?
A weak syllable is unstressed. A strong syllable carries the stress.
What is the opposites of strong?
The opposite of strong is usually "weak." Other anytonyms are frail or feeble. The opposite of a strong smell is a delicate fragrance.
Which word means the opposite of powerful?
Weak is the antonym (opposite of) the word strong.
Is it true that valid arguments are said to be strong or weak?
Valid arguments are not described as strong or weak. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument - if the premises logically lead to the conclusion. An argument can be valid but still weak if the premises are not well-supported or sound.
How would you reply to josiah strong arguments?
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.
Is a valid argument strong or weak?
Valid arguments must include facts and supporting documentation in order to strengthen the validity. If not, then the argument can be challenged.
How would you reply to strongs arguments?
No, arguments can either be strong or weak, however, a valid argument would be considered a sound argument. The opposite would be an invalid argument.
Can a valid argument be weak?
Yes, a valid argument can still be weak if the premises provided are not strong or relevant enough to support the conclusion. Validity refers to the logical structure of an argument, while the strength of an argument refers to the quality and persuasiveness of the premises.
What are advantages and disadvantages of truth table?
Advantages of truth tables are that they provide a clear and systematic way to represent all possible input-output combinations in a logic circuit. However, a disadvantage is that they become complex and unwieldy for circuits with a large number of inputs or outputs, making them difficult to interpret and analyze effectively.
All valid arguments are sound arguments?
This statement is not correct. A valid argument is one in which the conclusion logically follows from the premises, regardless of whether the premises are true or not. A sound argument, on the other hand, is a valid argument with true premises. So, while all sound arguments are valid, not all valid arguments are sound.
What are the distinguished features of cogent and uncogent arguments?
Both are inductive arguments, cogent is strong with all true premises, uncogent is either weak, or strong but with one or more false premises or both.
discuss briefly the similarities and differences between strong and weak arguments and cogent and uncogent argument support your discussion with your own examples?
discuss briefly the similarities and differences between strong and weak arguments and cogent and uncogent argument support your discussion with your own examples
Did Aristotle believe in logical appeals or emotion?
Aristotle believed in a balance between logic and emotion. He felt that logic was required for strong and valid arguments. Emotions reinforced logical arguments.
How do you identify a strong or weak argument?
A strong argument is supported by reasoning and evidence, is logically sound, and addresses counterarguments effectively. A weak argument lacks evidence, relies on emotion or fallacious reasoning, or fails to address opposing views adequately. It's important to evaluate the validity of the premises, the logical structure, and the relevance of the evidence when determining the strength of an argument.
Does any body know what are the strengths and weaknesses of the pragmatic argument?
All sound arguments are valid, but not all valid arguments are sound.
