0
Are animals taken from animal shelters used in animal testing?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Yes and No. In some states, it is illegal, but in others it's not. According to Wikipedia: In the U.S., some of the dogs are purpose-bred, while most are supplied by so-called Class B dealers licensed by the USDA to buy animals fromauctions, shelters, newspaper ads, and who are sometimes accused of stealing pets
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Are animals taken from animal shelters to be used for animal testing?
They usually breed them just for testing, but sometimes they do get them out of shelters and pounds.
Are animal by products and animal testing the same thing?
No these are not the same things animal by products are parts of the animal taken from the animal while animal testing is a horrid thing they do to animals if you would like to get more info than there are probably videos and information about both on theInternet
Where do animal testing labs get the animals?
might come from a pound, picked up as a stray, or stolen- sad to say This is not really very true. The majority of animals are purpose-bred by laboraties for use in animal testing, or by specialist breeders. Some animals are still taken from the wild, although it is illegal to use wild-caught primates in Europe for animal testing.
What animals are killed during animal testing?
yes well that's not the only reason there's hunting cars poachers animal fights cruel people real sudden environment changes but animal testing is a big part of it like dissection and testing new medicine and other experi Cancel ments
Where are my nearest animal shelters for adopting at?
My child is at an age where they want a pet. I know there are many unwanted pets out there and most get taken up by the wonderful animal shelters and want one from there. I would like to find out which animal shelters are in my area?
Why is animal testing wrong?
Animal Testing is WRONG. Think of all the suffering animals lives being torn apart for no apparent reason. It may help to cure cancer, but innocent lives are being taken just to try and experimEnt. Is it wrong? Yes. Help rebell against animal testing! animals are put through torture, so stop animal testing!
How is animal testing inhumane?
There are pro's and cons to animal testing. It can help discover life saving treatments for humans and other animals. However, it is sometimes said that animal testing is inhumane because the animals are in pain, or are not taken care of. However, there are government standards on research labs. The animals do not feel pain, and even though they may die eventually, they often live as long as a normal household pet.
What are the bad things for animal testing?
There are many harmful effects of animal testing. Namely, animals experience prolonged suffering and death. Also, companies continue to participate in animal testing as long as people fail to speak out against it.
All animals are in a group called the animal?
All the animals, taken together, are called the animal kingdom.
Animal testing is awful?
Animals have the right to be treated as beings of value in themselves, not as the means to human ends; this principle must be applied in order to guarantee the end of cruelty to animals. The application of this principle means that animals should never be experimented upon whatever the potential gain for humanity. To infect monkeys with the AIDS virus or to expose rodents to toxic chemicals and radiation is simply not acceptable, whatever the supposed benefits. Animal testing is cruel and almost useless. It really irks me when people say we need animal testing. There's a more humane way of testing then what they do now. Here's a few facts! Animals used in testing are most usually purchased from specialized breeding facilities. However, they may also be taken from the wild or acquired from animal shelters (through a practice known as "pound seizure"). Because mice and rats are excluded from the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), the actual number of animals used in product testing is unreported and unknown. It has been estimated that as many as 100 million mice are used in U.S. laboratories every year There can be an end to it but it requires us to stand up and stop listening to those who are standing up FOR medical testing on animals. Only WE can bring about this change guys, only WE can MAKE A DIFFERENCE but we have to join together.
Is animal testing cruel?
No. Animal testing is a necessary part of research. Animal testing has advanced our technology and medicine. Practicaly every medical breakthrough in recent years has been due to research with animals. For example, treatments for TB, AIDS/HIV, smallpox, polio, cancer, and other devestating illnesses could only have come up (ethically) as a result of animal testing. Additionally, not only do humans benefit, but so do animals. Veterinarian treatments (i.e. treatments for animals) are largely also the result of animal testing. Research on animals has also uncovered new ways on how to treat better treat animals. Had animal testing not existed, it is very unlikely that our healthcare and well-being would be as advanced as it is today. When working with animals, scientists are expected to follow a code of ethics. Included in this code are the 3Rs: Replacement: Scientists must exhaust alternative means to get the results without testing on the animals themselves. For example, instead of testing on animals, the answers can be found from archival video clips of nature, or from computer modeling. In other words, animal testing must only done as a last resort. Reduction: If testing on animals is necessary, scientists must use as few animals as possible. Refinement: When animal testing is necessary, scientists must refine their methods taken to eliminate any unnecessary suffering caused to the subjects. For example, if an animal must be opened to view something, the animal must be anaesthized, and if it is necessary to kill the animal, it must be put down in a humane manner. Unfortunately, there are indeed occasions where some researchers inflict unnecessary cruelty on animals, such as the Silver Spring monkey case. However, to use this to brand all animal testing as cruel is like using workplace abuse cases to brand all businessness as evil. No respectable scientist is motivated by sadism or desire to cause harm to animals. Remember, scientists are just as human as any other person on earth, and sometimes they make mistakes that have consequences. This is no more flawed than a person trying to rescue and free animals, only to unknowingly and unintentionally kill them. It is lamentable that animals are subject through this, but it is a sacrifice that is necessary for the better.
What are the most common places that animals get taken away from for testing?
U.K. or The United Kingdom
