0
Are consequential teleological and utilitarian ethics the same thing?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is goal based ethics?
The question, "What is ethics about?" has two different answers. Some think it is about character, and the discussion is about cultivating various virtues and avoiding various vices. On the other hand, some think it is about actions, and the discussion is about telling the difference between right actions and wrong actions. In our age, it's much more common to think that ethics is about actions than it is to think that it is about persons. If ethics is about actions rather than persons, it's reasonable to ask, "What makes an action right (as opposed to wrong)?" Basically, there are two different ways of looking at an action. This provides three possible views. (1) We can look at the intention behind it, in other words, what the agent was trying to do. (This is a "deontic" position.) The only thing that matters in giving a moral evaluation of an action is the agent's intention in doing it. (2) We can look at the consequences or results that the action spawns. This is a "teleological" position. The Greek word "telos" means "end" or "goal." Therefore, this is also sometimes called a goal-based ethics. (It is also sometimes called "utilitarianism.") The agent's intention is irrelevant. The only thing that counts is what actually happens. (3) We can adopt a mixed view, which says that a right action has to have both good intentions and optimizing consequences. Therefore, a goal-based ethics is a teleological or utilitarian theory. Its basic tenant is that the only thing that makes an action right is whether or not it is optimizing, whether or not its good consequences outweigh its bad consequences.
What is goals ethic?
The question, "What is ethics about?" has two different answers. Some think it is about character, and the discussion is about cultivating various virtues and avoiding various vices. On the other hand, some think it is about actions, and the discussion is about telling the difference between right actions and wrong actions. In our age, it's much more common to think that ethics is about actions than it is to think that it is about persons. If ethics is about actions rather than persons, it's reasonable to ask, "What makes an action right (as opposed to wrong)?" Basically, there are two different ways of looking at an action. This provides three possible views. (1) We can look at the intention behind it, in other words, what the agent was trying to do. (This is a "deontic" position.) The only thing that matters in giving a moral evaluation of an action is the agent's intention in doing it. (2) We can look at the consequences or results that the action spawns. This is a "teleological" position. The Greek word "telos" means "end" or "goal." Therefore, this is also sometimes called a goal-based ethics. (It is also sometimes called "utilitarianism.") The agent's intention is irrelevant. The only thing that counts is what actually happens. (3) We can adopt a mixed view, which says that a right action has to have both good intentions and optimizing consequences. Therefore, a goal-based ethics is a teleological or utilitarian theory. Its basic tenant is that the only thing that makes an action right is whether or not it is optimizing, whether or not its good consequences outweigh its bad consequences.
What is the difference between values and ethics on a database?
ethics are what you belive is the right thing to do love
What is the legal secretary's code of ethics?
There is no such thing.
What is the meaning of business ethics?
There is no such thing as "Business ethics." It is a contradiction in terms. Ethics is a moral consideration of good and evil, and the only good and evil that a business comprehends is profit and loss.
What is teleological ethics?
Ethical theories are divisible into those about persons (ethics of character or virtue or being) and those about actions (ethics of doing)."Telos" is the Greek word for "end" or "goal." A teleological ethical theory is an ethic of doing that focuses on the ends or goals of actions; they are also called "consequentialist" theories (of which utilitarianism is an example).By way of contrast, a deontological ethical theory is an ethic of doing that focuses on some aspect of actions other than their goals or ends, for example, the intentions from which they are done.
What is relationship of morality and legality and ethics?
Do the right thing because its right.
Importance of development ethics?
it help development planners to do right thing
Major tenets of ecocentric ethics?
Every living thing is intrinsically valuable and should be respected
Why do you need to study computer ethics?
Since information technology personnel can have a significant impact (both positive and negative) on a business, it is important to be able to trust IT personnel to do the right thing. Ethics is a field which helps define what is the right thing to do. See related links for an article which goes into some details about ethics and information technology.
Is gourd a noun?
Yes, the word 'gourd' is a noun; a word for a type of plant and its fruit; a word for the dried shell of this fruit made into utilitarian items; a word for a thing.
It has been said sales ethics is an oxymoron?
I am guessing that you want this explained . . . ? The phrase implies that there is no such thing as ethics in sales. Put another way, those in sales are unethical.
