They would only be uncomfortable if you picked the wrong shoe size. Otherwise you should be fine. :-)
It used to be. I prefer Converse. But I have found that the tennis shoes that I buy from Converse are not comfortable. After walking or standing in them for several hours, I find that my feet are sore. I now buy Nike tennis shoes. They seem to be a little more comfortable.
Converse Boots are a type of workers boot. Usually a Converse Boot will use woolen, silk or cloth soles to make it comfortable for the person wearing them.
The different features of a Converse Varvatos is that it is a newer shoe and it is designed for people in our day and age to wear and enjoy, and be very comfortable as well.
Converse All-Stars shoes are expensive track shoes that are comfortable and are used when playing sports. The shoes are also a status symbol for the wearer.
Keen Maderas Oxford are pretty similar to Converse. they're not totally like them but, they have arch supports and they're pretty comfortable, and they look good.
The benefits of Converse baby shoes are that babies will become more used to wearing shoes and will therefore be comfortable with walking and running as well as other activities that require shoes.
Yes! They have a lot more support and are warmer in the winter than converse all stars for example...
.To sell shoes. .To help Nike and other shoe companies .To provide comfortable and affordable shoes for consumers
Converse :)
Chuck Taylors are much more flimsy so they will provide more comfort for your foot.
Marquis Mills Converse, the founder of Converse
Converse used to be considered superior to PF Flyers. PF Flyers were the cheaper alternative. Today however, PF Flyers are built much more nicely, and their posture foundation makes them much more comfortable and versatile than flat-soled Converses. Everyone knows about Converse, PF Flyers are definitely cooler and show good taste.