The parents are responsible for their child until legal age.
Only if you expect your insurance to cover you if the child has an accident. You auto insurance contract states that you are responsible for listing all household members and drivers who drive your vehicles. If you do not do this then you have committed material misrepresentation and the insurance company is then not responsible for paying for the damage from the accident.
Sometimes, but the an adult child has their own life now, right? The parents aren't really responsible. They probaly did there best to grow their disabled child as best they could.
No, you are not responsible for their back child support.
If the child is over age 18, then the parent is not responsible for the child's medical bills. The child is legally responsible for anything that the insurance policy did not pay.
Usually the Daycare would have something about that in their policy, and most often Daycares will have an insurance for that type of thing (injuries to children). Sometimes their insurance will not cover a major accident or injury though. If not, the parents or guardians of the child would be responsible for the medical treatment, but if it was a serious situation you could take it to court and/or sue the company, or put in a formal complaint.
Yes. If they live in your household or are in college or if they drive your vehicles ever. If they were licensed earlier they should have been added earlier but better late than never. I have seen several cases where a child had an accident, was not listed as a driver on the policy, so the insurance company denies coverage and the parent is responsible for the total accident. This means you would be responsible for the damage to your vehicle, injuries to your child and anyone else in the vehicle, damage to whatever they hit, and injuries plus losses to any other people that are injured. You are also responsible for any and all legal costs that the insurance company would have also paid. The cost could be almost unlimited.
That depends on the specific situation. If the child is still on the parent's insurance, the parents will be responsible. But once they are on their own, it is their issue.
If the child is under age 18, then the parent is responsible for her medical bills. That is not the same as being responsible for providing her health insurance. At this point, (2013), there is not a requirement to have health insurance. If the child is age 18 or older, then the parent is not responsible for her bills. The hospital or physician's office may try to involve you, and encourage you to help her, but legally, the parent would not have the responsibility.
If you live in a state where an 18 year old is a legal adult then that adult is legally responsible for himself or herself. He or she is responsible for his own debts and liabilities. You are not liable for co-pays on his medical bills. If you are covering your adult child on your health insurance you are responsible to pay the premiums. If you choose not to cover your adult child on your health insurance plan you are not required to keep him or her covered under your plan. He or she is responsible to obtain their own health insurance plan if you choose not to put him on your plan. Most insurance plans will not place an adult child on your insurance plan if he or she is not attending school....and there can be restrictions on the amount of classes a student is taking to qualify to stay on your health insurance plan. Any adult child living in your home you are not legally responsible to provide health insurance, pay his or her bills or medical bills. You are even legally allowed to charge that adult child for expenses incurred by him or her.
Well if your child made rates jump due to an accident, you need to change insurance companies and exclude that child from the policy.
If your child has a license the insurance on the car will probably cover it. The company can take the position that they were not supposed to be driving it and are not covered in which case it would come back to you because the child is underage.
I would certainly hope so.