answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Those people could not have cared less one way or the other, it was only money, money, money they were interested in, the slaves were nothing more than merchandise to be bought and sold, so their morals were never questioned.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1w ago

Slave traders are pro-slavery as they engage in the buying and selling of enslaved individuals for profit, perpetuating the institution of slavery. Abolitionists, on the other hand, are individuals or groups that work to end slavery and the slave trade.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Are slave traders Pro slavery or Abolition?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

What is the difference between pro slavery and anti slavery?

Pro slavery refers to the advocacy or support for the institution of slavery, where individuals believe in owning and exploiting other people as property. Anti slavery, on the other hand, opposes the practice of slavery and advocates for the abolition of slavery, promoting equality and freedom for all individuals.


Which of the following statements about pro-slavery ideology is not correct?

Pro-slavery ideology argued that slavery was justified through religious teachings, scientific racism, and economic necessity. It did not advocate for the abolition of slavery based on humanitarian principles.


Who would most likely have a pro-slavery point of view?

Individuals in the antebellum South, particularly slave owners, plantation owners, and advocates of states' rights and white supremacy, would most likely have a pro-slavery point of view. They believed in the economic benefits of slavery, the preservation of their way of life, and the superiority of the white race.


What is pro-slavery and anti slavery?

Pro-slavery refers to the belief that owning slaves is acceptable or beneficial, while anti-slavery refers to the opposition against slavery and the belief in the equality and freedom of all individuals, regardless of race.


What is the difference between an abolitionist and pro-slavery?

An abolitionist is someone who actively works to end slavery, while a pro-slavery person supports and advocates for the continuation of slavery. Abolitionists believe in the equal rights and freedom of all individuals, while pro-slavery individuals believe in the right to own and exploit others as property.

Related questions

Was the fugitive slave act anti or pro slavery?

The Fugitive Slave Act was a pro-slavery part of the Compromise of 1850.


What new state formed as a result of the conflict over the war?

West Virginia. Virginia was pro slavery, West Virginia was pro abolition.


Was the election of Lincoln to the presidency pro slavery or antislavery?

The election of Lincoln to the presidency was considered to be both pro-slavery and antislavery. However, he was predominantly supported by antislavery forces because he fought for abolition.


What is the difference between pro slavery and anti slavery?

Pro slavery refers to the advocacy or support for the institution of slavery, where individuals believe in owning and exploiting other people as property. Anti slavery, on the other hand, opposes the practice of slavery and advocates for the abolition of slavery, promoting equality and freedom for all individuals.


What was Lincoln's main position on slavery?

Lincoln was at first undecided about slavery. Later on, his views were that all men were created equal and slavery had not place in the US.


What states were added in the Missouri Compromise and how did this keep a balance of power in the Senate?

In 1820, Maine was added as a non-slave state (23rd), and Missouri was added as a "slave state" (slavery allowed). This plan kept the number of Northern, pro-abolition states equal to the number of Southern, anti-abolition states, 12 each. But after the Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) established a state's right to choose its status on slavery, the Missouri Compromise was no longer in force.


What were the attitudes of the north and south regarding slavery and race relations and their responses to abolition?

Northern states had a completely different attitude towards slavery and race equality. Abolition campaign was very strong in the north and had the support of political and religious leaders. North had become an industrialized and urbanized region with little dependence on agriculture, where slaves were largely utilized. Slavery was viewed negatively in north and by 1840 almost the entire African American populace in north was free. In a total contrast, southern states' economy depended on plantation agriculture where slavery was a vital part of society. The attitude of southerners was pro slavery and after the election victory of Abraham Lincoln, slave states decided to secede from the union as they feared a end of slavery under pro-abolition Lincoln.


What has the author EN Elliott written?

E.N Elliott has written: 'Cotton is king, and pro-slavery arguments' -- subject(s): Slavery and slave-trade, Slavery


Which of the following statements about pro-slavery ideology is not correct?

Pro-slavery ideology argued that slavery was justified through religious teachings, scientific racism, and economic necessity. It did not advocate for the abolition of slavery based on humanitarian principles.


How was the fugitive slave act pro slavery?

The Fugitive Slave Act required that runaway slaves be returned to their owners, regardless of where they were found. This strengthened the institution of slavery by allowing slave owners to reclaim their "property" even if they had escaped to free states. The act also imposed harsh penalties on those who aided escaped slaves, further enforcing pro-slavery sentiments.


What arguments did the southern pro slavery whites employ to defend slavery?

Southern pro-slavery whites argued that slavery was a necessary economic institution that was vital to the Southern way of life. They believed that slavery was justified by the Bible and that it was beneficial for both slaves and slave owners. Additionally, they argued that African Americans were inferior and better off under the care of white slave owners.


Republican radical who was savagely beaten was?

Charles Sumner, a prominent proponent of the Abolition movement, was savagely beaten by pro slavery representative Preston Brooks.