It depends on how far and how many ammo are left. Guns are better than swords in shooting range and reloading ammo(bullets). Swords are better than guns in close combat and doesn't run out of ammo. Somehow, swords can block bullets that guns had fired. Gun weapons cannot slice like blade weapons but they can shoot from great distances but guns also have problems. They have to reload after they ran out of ammo. Guns have to reload so they can fire again and have reload another clip of rounds(ammo) until there are nomore bullets. Swords are the only blade weapons that have unlimited ammo, their blade. This means that swords does not need to reload another clip of bullets. Swords are silent weapons because they're not loud like guns. Guns are noisy weapons and they don't have unlimited ammo. Guns would probably win swords in shooting range from great distances but swords would win against guns for blocking those bullets and attack in close range combat.
It depends on the type of gun and the type of sword.
Guns are better than swords. Swords are USELESS. They aren't use anymore because we have guns which are better and more advanced weapon. Swords have been in the time of gladiators, vikings, and ninjas. Today, we use guns and NOT swords because guns are a more effective and lethal weapon.Swords are USELESS. They suck and will LOSE against a Gun. Guns are BETTER. And whoever say Swords are Better, They Suck Balls.
No, swords are weapons that don't run out of ammo like guns. Guns run out of ammo, not swords. Swords have infinite ammo. Their infinite ammo is their blade, not bullets. Guns run out of ammo and have to be reloaded. Some how, swords are better than guns because swords can deflect bullets. Guns uses bullets and swords uses blades.
jak 2 is better because u have guns and assassins only have swords
Statistically, no.
Swords can reflect bullets(block bullets) but somehow, swords cannot run out of ammo. Yes, swords are deadlier than guns because they can slice. Guns can run out of bullets because they shoot and have to reload. Guns fire and reload after firing and then reload after firing until there are nomore bullets left. Swords does not need to reload. They can continue to kill more enemies without having to reload. Guns can kill enemies but swords can kill even more enemies. Real men use swords, not guns. <><><><> I would pont out that modern day armies and law enforcement officers use firearms, not swords.
Yes and no. Poor quality swords can be gotten for as low as $20. Good quality swords can cost in the thousands.
yes, they had swords as well as musket guns
Yes, machine guns are better than Gatling guns because they fire more bullets faster than Gatling guns. Gatling guns need to have bullets and have to be hand cranked at the same time but machine guns does not need to be hand cranked. Machine guns only need bullets.
Swords and daggers were replaced with guns.
Swords & guns.
Sex, guns, and swords.
Swords?Or Daggers