I wouldn't say one is better then the other, I'd say they have both have qualities that meet different operational requirements. A bullpup can fit a longer barrel in a more compact size. I.E. it will present a shorter profile with a long barrel.
That depends. If you are planning on killing rodents then the airgun is better. But if you are planning on shooting other people then the air-soft gun is better. -Jeff
Non traditional marketing is faster and efficient than traditional marketing.
Better than 90% of the people who shoot them.
Yes, a single-parent family is no better or worse than the traditional family.
NO
The rifles had superior range and accuracy compared to the smoothbore musket.
It is smaller in size and uses less energy than a traditional oven. This is better because it can help to lower your electrical costs.
The Roth IRA is not necessarily better per se than a traditional IRA. Whether one or the other is a better choice for you depends on current and expected marginal income.
A bayonet is intended to be mounted ON a rifle. If bayonets alone were more effective than rifles, armies would not have been buying rifles for the past 400 years.
It depends how you use the knowledge
Yes because they require more care, and are made better than traditional denture. Over time though you may wished you would have switched to traditional.
In my opinion, radiant heat is better than a traditional furnace. You have more control over how much heat you want, and where you want the heat. Using radiant heat is also more cost effective.