I think so.
All horses have the chestnuts on the inside of the legs.
no, chestnuts are not of use to horses. People believe way back when, horses had fingers and toes.
This is absolutley true. the boney things are called chestnuts, and all horses and ponies have them!!!
Chestnuts and Horse Chestnuts are not the same thing. Chestnuts are edible by humans. Horse Chestnuts (Buckeyes) are not edible and are generally considered poisonous --- even to horses!
A horses chestnuts are just like a human fingerprint, no two are exactly alike. The chestnuts could be used in much the same way as a human fingerprint for identifying a horse if a 'chestnut database' were set up.
The chestnuts on the insides of horses legs are the remaints of its "toes". When horses were first created, they were slightly bigger than a chicken(i know it sounds wierd!) but its true. Its name was Eohippus. Horses first had toes instead of hooves but over the years, they have become hooves.
Yes, although they are more prominate on the front legs.
I don't think so. See "Can you eat a pine cone".
The chestnut on a horses leg is the remnant from when they were multi toed animals. The Chestnut has absolutely no bearing on if a horse can swim or not.
Yes the horses brain is very small and not connected.
Horses are just called "horses" unless they are in a group together. When horses get in a group together, they are then called a "herd".
Conkers