Not nessecarily; deer are also prey to other predators of the wild, such as cougars, coyotes, and mountain lions, not to mention ourselves, as many of us hunt for meat and sport. Also, without predators picking off the weaker ones, the deer population would increase tremendously, along with the same genetics mixing more, resulting in deformities. The wolves do, yes, hunt, kill, and feed on the deer, but mainly stick to the weaker ones, such as ones hindered by injuries, age, deformities, fatigue, etc.
my mom died in a wild deer accident, it bucked her off while she was riding it and she hit her head on a tree in the forest. and then she was eaten by wild wolves
the deer would over populate the island and an eating their food food sorces an eventually die off
Without a healthy population of wolves, elk and deer (and other deer species) habitually graze on aspen, willow, and cottonwood sprouts, preventing young trees from growing into mature trees. This essentially starves the beavers, causing them to either die off, or go elsewhere. It's all part of the trophic cascade.
Bears typically do not hunt large animals like deer or cougars, but they will scavenge off the kills of other animals such as wolves and cougars.
See the tree, how big is grown, it was just a twig
Consumers would be better off without intermediaries. Intermediaries lead to the unnecessary increase in the prices of consumer products and services.
You are better off without them
You are better off without him
drama
The clarks
Deer hunting with a .22 is illegal in most states, including California. It's too small a rifle to use on deer, you're better off using it for shooting squirrels, game birds and pigeons.
By rubbing them off trees bark or in the duel with another deer