Consumers would be better off without intermediaries. Intermediaries lead to the unnecessary increase in the prices of consumer products and services.
Yes, consumers and the marketing environment are certainly mutually inclusive. Without the consumer, corporations would have nobody to market their products to.
high osl consumers tend to accept risky and novel products readily compared to low osl consumers
Two decisions that you would have to make when it comes to your channel strategy is the length and width of your channeling.Channel length: it is the number of different types and levels of intermediaries used in your channel strategy (i.e. wholesalers, retailers, pharmacies, etc)Channel width: it is the extent to which your channel covers the market either by distributing your product through the greatest number of intermediaries or to only oneIntensive Distribution: this strategy would be where you have the greatest number of intermediaries carry your product (all wholesalers and retailers that are willing to stock and sell your product)Selective Distribution: this strategy is where you distribute your product using a fewer amount of intermediariesExclusive distribution: this strategy is when you selling your product through only a single outlet typically only in one region
The do not want to deal with the hassles involved in international distribution (tariffs, customs etc.). They also may not have a developed distribution network of their own in other countries.
store atmosphere
Without channel intermediaries, each buyer would have to interact directly with each seller. This interaction would be extremely inefficient. Imagine its impact on the total costs of each exchange.
consumers without producers
Marketing was with trade
Without producers, consumers would not exist.
Producers. Without them there would be no consumers because they would have nothing to consume.
Yes and no, without them there would be no life because primary consumers would die without food, and then secondary consumers and so forth. However secondary consumers don't feed directly from the producers so they are not all the food in that sense.
The green plants are eaten by the consumers. Without the consumers, there would be too many plants...
no because without fractions we would have no accuracy
He thought it would make the Chinese better consumers
I believe that he would have been better without the operation
animals that eat both producers and other consumers are
animals that eat both producers and other consumers are