there is no records on the Jews because they stole them
The Bible gives no names for any of the Romans involved in the crucifixion of Jesus other than that of Procurator Pontius Pilate.
There is no surname that is used only by Jews. There are many surnames that are used both by Jews and non-Jews. Therefore, any surname that is used by a Jewish family is Jewish, and any surname that is used by a non-Jewish family is not Jewish. So any surname can be both Jewish and non-Jewish at the same time.
A Jewish person may have almost any name possible, but there are no names that are traditionally both Scottish and Jewish.
Although Salada is not a Jewish surname in its origin, any name can be a Jewish name if it is the name of a Jewish person.
Although Howell is not a stereotypically Jewish surname, any name can be a Jewish name if it is the name of a Jewish person.
The Bible gives no names for any of the Romans involved in the crucifixion of Jesus other than that of Procurator Pontius Pilate.
Yes Crucifixion was a roman punishment inflicted on slaves,rebels and non Romans. its technique was varied, including nails, ropes or a combination of both. It was meant to be a spectacle of obscenity. Crucifixon was invented in earlier times. Cathage was known to practise it and was probably adopted by the Romans from them.
After the Romans sacked Jerusalem in 70 CE. they are reported to have sold many women and children into slavery. Again, after the Jewish revolt of 132-135, the Romans sold many defeated Jews as slaves.
No. Most historians now think that the whole story was made up by the apostle Mark for dramatic effect: the name Barabbas (litterally: 'son of a father') is first of all unknown as a (sur)name in Hebrew or any of the surrounding cultures. The Roman "tradition" of releasing a criminal on the Jewish Easter to which the Bible refers, did in fact not exist and the Romans - meticulous record-keepers in administrative matters - never mentioned any pardoning of prisoners on that or any other Easter celebration and the name Barabbas appears nowhere in their or anyone else's records.
We do not have any records of the family of Joseph. He came from a Jewish family that was probably lower middle class or, possibly, poor.
There are no surviving records about any family that St. George may have had. However, at the time, Roman soldiers were generally not married.
There is no such holiday.Jews do not have any equivalent to Easter and Most do not celebrate Easter. Those that do, only celebrate the secular, Spring-related elements.
I am no religious expert, but I believe the reason is because Jesus was betrayed by someone close to him, who was Jewish. Of course, I believe everyone that was close to him was Jewish. So it's kind like me saying "the Mexicans are out to get me" because there's a guy named Hector who is Mexican and is out to get me. Any time you say the (insert large group here) did something because of the actions of a few you are way off base.
No. The Holiday originated as a festival called "Saturnalia" among Roman Pagans, but there was no mention in any records of their sexual orientations.
Both. The Roman Empire wasn't run by idiots. They knew that they could not impose Roman law in its entirety on all of their subject peoples, so they allowed significant autonomy. Local traditions were tolerated, and that included allowing local law to operate under Roman rule. But any question involving a Roman citizen was decided under Imperial law, as was any question of Imperial security.
Do any of the President's advisers have criminal records?
There is no surname that is used only by Jews. There are many surnames that are used both by Jews and non-Jews. Therefore, any surname that is used by a Jewish family is Jewish, and any surname that is used by a non-Jewish family is not Jewish. So any surname can be both Jewish and non-Jewish at the same time.