0
Are there any courts that have admitted evidence based on facial recognition software?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Courts of appeal focus their attention on which aspect of a case?
On whatever issue is up on appeal. For example, if I have a trial and hearsay evidence is admitted, and I think that this was a legal mistake, and I lose, I can appeal and argue that the improper admission of this evidence caused me to lose, and the case should be reversed and I should be given a new trial, without that evidence. The court would then consider my legal argument that the evidence should not be admitted, along with the other side's argument that it should, in light of the relevant law.
When did DNA evidence become admissible in court?
In general, state and federal courts have increasingly accepted DNA evidence as admissible. The first state appellate court decision to uphold the admission of DNA evidence was in 1988 (Andrews v. Florida, 533 So. 2d 841 [Fla. App.]), and the first major federal court decision to uphold its admission occurred in Jakobetz. By the mid-1990s, most states' courts admitted DNA test results into evidence.
How many high courts are booked in Mumbai for recording evidence?
how many indian high courts are booked in mumbai for recording evidence
What two forms of evidence did new England courts recognize as proof that a person was a witch?
Two forms of evidence that New England courts recognized as proof that a person was a witch were spectral evidence and effluvia.
What has the author Harry Lushington Stephen written?
Harry Lushington Stephen has written: 'A digest of the law of evidence in courts martial (under the Army and Air Force Acts)' -- subject(s): Courts-martial and courts of inquiry, Evidence (Law)
What is inevitable discovery?
In a criminal procedure, the inevitable discovery rule allows evidence of a defendant's guilt to be admitted as evidence in a trial. The exclusionary rule judges the admissibility of evidence and under the constitutional law, the evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights is sometimes inadmissible for a criminal prosecution in a court of law. In simple terms, the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule allows into evidence illegally seized items that would have been discovered lawfully anyway. This exception allows evidence to be admitted, even though it was seized in violation of the Constitution. In order to successfully assert the inevitable discovery exception, some courts require that the prosecution demonstrate that the police were in the process of actively pursuing a lawful investigation that would have led inevitably to the discovery of the evidence at the time that the evidence was illegally obtained.
Falsehood is to deceive as evidence is to what?
Falsehood is to deceive as evidence is to prove. Prove is a word that is commonlyÊ used in law courts.
What are the basic functions of the polygraph and its legal status in the courts?
In police work, the two major uses of polygraph testing are specific issue testing and preemployment screening. In specific issue testing, the polygraph is used to investigate whether a particular person is responsible for or involved in the commission of a specific offense. Polygraph testing can help to verify information collected during traditional background investigations and to uncover information not otherwise available. The commonly held belief that polygraph examination results are not admitted into evidence in court is untrue. Some courts admit polygraph evidence even over the objection of counsel; in other jurisdictions, polygraph results are admitted by stipulation
What is inevitable discovery rule?
In a criminal procedure, the inevitable discovery rule allows evidence of a defendant's guilt to be admitted as evidence in a trial. The exclusionary rule judges the admissibility of evidence and under the constitutional law, the evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights is sometimes inadmissible for a criminal prosecution in a court of law. In simple terms, the inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule allows into evidence illegally seized items that would have been discovered lawfully anyway. This exception allows evidence to be admitted, even though it was seized in violation of the Constitution. In order to successfully assert the inevitable discovery exception, some courts require that the prosecution demonstrate that the police were in the process of actively pursuing a lawful investigation that would have led inevitably to the discovery of the evidence at the time that the evidence was illegally obtained.
Are emails and attachments considered legal evidence?
Courts now recognize e-mail messages and attachments as legal evidence.
How do judicial reviews in the dissent from those majority opinion?
The majority opinion uses lower courts' decisions on the same case as evidence.
How many attorneys are admitted to practice in federal courts?
The number is HUGE and I seriously, SERIOUSLY doubt that there are any statistics kept on this.
