I think so because viruses usually go inside bacteria and take over the bacteria cell
But I'm totally sure
Yes
there are some bacteria that approach the size of larger viruses but, viruses are smaller than bacteria
Yes, viruses are smaller than bacteria.
Viruses are non-living entities that show characteristics of living beings inside another living cell. Viruses consist of genetic material surrounded by protein coat. They lack organelles or membranes. Thus, they are very much smaller than bacterial cells which have membranes, and sometimes even organelles. In fact, many viruses inhabit bacterial cells. They are called bacteriophages. The smallest bacteria are in the order of .3 micrometers, while the largest viruses are in the order of 400 nanometers. A virus is smaller than bacteria A virus is smaller than bacteria
Bacteria and viruses can breed. i.e. When bacteria breeds, they form large colonies visible to the naked eye When viruses breed, they become more deadly or mutate but are still virtually invisible to the naked eye.
Yes, The largest virus is smaller then the smallest bacteria.
I think so because viruses usually go inside bacteria and take over the bacteria cell But I'm totally sure
Viruses are always smaller than bacteria.
All the disease causing viruses are smaller in size than bacteria. Rickettsia and chlamydia are other groups of organisms, which are smaller than true bacteria.
yes a virus is way smaller
The difference is that viruses are smaller than bacteria. One more major difference is that bacteria are living things whereas viruses are non living things.
Yes, bacteria can be seen under a light microscope as they are larger than viruses. However, viruses are much smaller and cannot be seen with a light microscope. Specialized electron microscopes are required to visualize viruses.
Fungi are biggest as they have much longer cell structures than both bacteria and viruses. Bacteria are 2nd largest and viruses smallest.