We are never obligated to trust our emotions, even withclear supporting evidence. However, it seems we often do trust our emotions even when that is contrary to clear supporting evidence that we should not.
Relying solely on personal opinions or emotions without supporting evidence or research would not help analyze nonfiction. It is essential to approach nonfiction analysis with critical thinking, fact-checking, and evidence-based reasoning.
Often attributed to Shakespeare, but without any supporting evidence. In other words 'we dont know'
Which of the following statements about the Progressives is not true Interpretations of a story with a great deal of evidence that support them are better than those without supporting evidence.
The statement uses the propaganda technique of "glittering generalities." By labeling Goodly as the "only safe city," it creates a positive and appealing image without providing concrete evidence or comparing it to other cities in the state. This technique is designed to evoke emotions and create a favorable impression without supporting facts.
Yes, there can be learning without emotions. Learning could be pale too without the involvement of emotions.
Yes, there can be learning without emotions. Learning could be pale too without the involvement of emotions.
Yes, learning can occur without feelings or emotions being involved. People can acquire knowledge through logical reasoning, observation, and understanding without necessarily experiencing strong emotions. However, emotions can often enhance learning by increasing motivation, focus, and memory retention.
Supporting a thesis with evidence is crucial as it enhances the credibility and persuasiveness of the argument. Evidence helps to validate the claims made in the thesis and provides a solid foundation for the reader to understand and accept the viewpoint presented. Without evidence, a thesis may lack substance and fail to convince the audience of its validity.
there is nothing GOD made without giving it emotions.
Methuselah, a Hebrew at the age of 969. This is of course a legendary story without supporting historical evidence, so it would be prudent to put a decimal point in his age.
The duration of Without Evidence is 1.55 hours.
No.