that depends on a couple of things
first of all what type of crash did you have , were you involved with another vehicle , a person and animal etc.
secondly how did you determine that the "unkept road " was the cause and what was the unkept condition that caused the accident in your opinion.
Basically you cant blame the road condition for an accident unless you can show that the unkept nature was either the contributinig factor to the accident and that is was a condition which was in place for a reasonably long period of time where the owner of the road knew it was defective and failed to repair it or adequately notified drivers (for example put up a sign or flasher etc to warn of the hazard) The idea is that you should be aware of the road condition and have your vehicle under control to avoid such hazards - good luck
Regardless of wether or not they are family, they are still at fault for crashing into you so therfore they should still cover the cost of any damages caused.
Pedestrians can be legally at fault for causing a crash
It means that you are literally at fault for damages incurred from the accident, including other vehicles, municipal/state property, and the damage caused to your own vehicle. Your insurance will have to pick up the tab on all of this, and the city will probably fine you for crashing and destroying their property.
the one that is at fault is the driver that pulls out of their space that then caused both cars to crash . the one at fault should have waited until the other driver parks .
A strike slip fault.
Reverse Fault
A normal fault.
No, Because Reverse fault is caused by compression and a normal fault is caused by tension.
A transverse fault
A normal fault caused the 1556 Shaanxi earthquake.
normal fault and reverse fault.
Fault