When you know there's an animal inside an area, you should at least ask if the door needs to be kept closed. Not being your dog is not the point. You're probably not legally liable, since it wasn't your dog, but friends don't tell friends, "I don't care if I cause you trouble and expense."
The owner of the car is going to be held liable. And it won't do your daughter any good either, it will delay her being able to get a license.
The owner of the vehicle is going to be held liable for any damages caused by the underage driver.
The thief of the car is responsible, not the owner of the car. How can the owner control his car being stolen? However, if the owner or person in charge of the vehicle left the keys in the ignition, liabilty may attach in some jurisdictions.
the driver and the owner is liable for anything
The driver and the owner is liable.
Who is the owner of the car your adult daughter was driving, you or her? If you, you can both be liable. Her as the driver, and you as the owner of the vehicle
Both the Driver and the Owner are liable for the damages. The driver, whether licensed or not is the primarily liable party. The insured passenger owner is secondarily liable for damages by the unlicensed driver he permitted to operate his vehicle.
The owner of the dog is, because they're held responsible for the actions of that animal as the owner of it.
The owner of the car is liable for the accident itself and the damage. However, the insurance company might have to pay for it, depending on the owners insurance cover.
the owner of the vehicle is always responceable in this situation..
The Bike Owner is Liable if he allowed the minor to operate the bike unknown to the parent.The Parent is Liable if the parent was aware and allowed the minor child to operate the bike.The Owner of the land is Not Liable unless you could show that he caused the injuries..
Yes, the co-owner would be legally liable for using money in the account from an estate that was not settled.