because in order for blending inheritance to occur, all variation would have to be diluted out
Omg i have the exact question on my packet....
The inheritance of a dominant and a recessive allele results in a blending of traits to produce intermediate characteristics.
He did not influence Darwin and Darwin did not know who he was. Darwin's ' blending theory of inheritance ' was wrong and though Darwin did not particularly like the theory he could think of nothing better to explain inheritance. There is a legend that Darwin had a copy of Mendel's work in his desk but could not read it because it was in German. Just a legend, though.
Blending inheritance was one hypothesis for how traits were passed from one generation to the next. The idea was that if both parents had different traits for a particular character, then the offspring would exhibit a blend of the two traits. For example, if the character in question is flower petal color, and one parent had white flowers and the other had red flowers, the hypothesis of blending inheritance would predict the offspring would have pink flowers, a blend of the two parent traits. In fact, if you cross red and white flowered plants, you do get a pink flower. However, Mendel was able to show that the inheritance of flower color was particulate, not blending, by going one step further and crossing two pink flowered parents. He found the offspring had a ratio of 1:2:1 for red:pink:white, so the granparents' traits were reappearing. This "skipping of generations" was classically Mendelian: the alleles for red and white were both contained in the pink flowers, so that when they were crossed, they were able to be seen in the offspring. In this case, consider that red flowers have the genotype RR (homozygous for R allele), white flowers have the genotype WW (homozygous for the W allele), and pink flowers have the genotype RW (heterozygous), where R and W are two different alleles for flower color. When red (RR) and white (WW) are crossed, the offspring can only get the R allele from the red parent and the W allele from the white parent, so they are all heterozygous (RW), resulting in a pink color. When two pinks are crossed (RW x RW), then each parent can give either a red allele (R) or a white allele (W) to the offspring, resulting in the following equally likely possible combinations: RW, RR, WW, and WR. Since WR and RW are the same (pink), the expected ratio of offspring is 1 RR: 2 RW: 1 WW. This is considered an example of particulate inheritance, not blending inheritance, because the alleles (particles) are being preserved throughout the generations; it is simply the combinations of alleles that give the appearance of a blending inheritance mechanism when red and white are crossed to produce pink. In classical genetics, the first cross between red (RR) and white (WW) was considered the P (parental) generation. The hybrid offspring produced (RW) were considered the first filial generation (F1). Crossing two F1's shows that the inheritance is particulate, by looking at the 1:2:1 ratio in the F2 generation (1 red: 2 pink: 1 white). Mendel was able to deduce the theory of particulate inheritance by carefully following the generations from P to F1 to F2.
because in order for blending inheritance to occur, all variation would have to be diluted out
Blending inheritance is inheritance in which contrasting parental characters appear as a blend in the offspring.
A coherent mechanism of inheritance. His " blending " concept was totally wrong as Mendel showed that inheritance is particulate in nature.
well what HAPPEN THAT UR FACE IN BUTUS
Omg i have the exact question on my packet....
The blending hypothesis, but not the particulate hypothesis, maintained that after a mating, the genetic material provided by each of the two parents is mixed in the offspring, losing its individual identity.
Both failed to understand the mechanism of inheritance. Darwin had a mistake " blending " idea and Wallace seemed to go along with this concept, though inheritance is particulate.
Aristotle believed that inheritance was the transmission of traits and characteristics from parents to offspring through a blending of their physical and mental qualities. He argued that heredity played a role in shaping an individual's nature and behavior.
By giving the theory a mechanism of inheritance. Particulate inheritance, where each parent contributes chromosomes ( Mendel dod not know what a chromosome was and called genes " factors " ) that contain separate alleles that contribute to the progeny's traits. Darwin's idea of " blending " inheritance was completely wrong.
No. Blending it is a physical change. The tomato changes how it looks but all of its properties stay the same.
They have the same inheritance rights.
Replacing and blending pixels at same time.