because in order for blending inheritance to occur, all variation would have to be diluted out
Omg i have the exact question on my packet....
False, your hypothesis has fallacies.
to deal with an anomalie you must incude them in your reserarch as they my mean your hypothesis is incorrect if you get lots of them
A hypothesis doesn't necessarily need to be correct. After a scientist has conducted an experiment and discovered that their hypothesis is incorrect, they still have gained the knowledge and the results from their experiment---as well as the correct answer, in some cases. They can use the results from the experiment that tested the original hypothesis to form a new experiment.
The inheritance of a dominant and a recessive allele results in a blending of traits to produce intermediate characteristics.
The blending hypothesis, but not the particulate hypothesis, maintained that after a mating, the genetic material provided by each of the two parents is mixed in the offspring, losing its individual identity.
Omg i have the exact question on my packet....
Lamarck's incorrect hypothesis regarding inheritance.... Lamarck did not know how traits were inherited (Traits are passed through genes) Genes are not changed by activities in life. They change through mutation occurs before an organism is born.
Blending inheritance is inheritance in which contrasting parental characters appear as a blend in the offspring.
Mendel showed in his experiments that inherited traits are not passed through the blending of inheritance theory. According to the blending of inheritance theory, an offspring's traits are a blend between the traits of the parent organisms. In Mendel's experiments however, he showed that this was not true, and that inheritance is actually based on genes, through the observation of recessive traits. He observed that an offspring could have a trait that neither of the parents had, which is now explained through both of the parents having the recessive gene for the trait, but not showing it because they are heterozygous dominant. There is a 25% chance that the offspring of two heterozygous dominant parents will produce a homozygous recessive offspring that will show the trait that neither of the parents shows.
to see if your hypothesis was correct or incorrect.
say that your hypothesis is incorrect in your conclusion
well what HAPPEN THAT UR FACE IN BUTUS
A coherent mechanism of inheritance. His " blending " concept was totally wrong as Mendel showed that inheritance is particulate in nature.
If your hypothesis is totally incorrect then it is quite likely that the data will not support it.
Reject the hypothesis.
if the hypothesis is proven to be correct or incorrect