answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The disagreement over if and how slaves should be counted for Congressional apportionment purposes. The opposing sides were the northern states and the southern states. The northern states who opposed slavery argues that only free state inhabitants could be counted towards apportionment while the southern states argued that slaves should counted towards their population apportionment number.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

The Northern States argued that since Southern planters did not consider slaves to be worthy of even the most basic rights, slaves should not be counted for purposes of representation. The Southern States, knowing that they would have more power if slaves were included in the count, predictably disagreed. This disagreement led to the three fifths compromise.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

The disagreement was whether slaves should count for taxes, and population, or not. And the three-fifths compromise was out of every five slaves, three counted towards taxes and population.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

The disagreement was whether slaves should count for taxes, and population, or not. And the three-fifths compromise was out of every five slaves, three counted towards taxes and population.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

6y ago

At issue was whether or not to count slaves as people when determining a state's population. The compromise literally meant that for census purposes, one slave was counted as 3/5 of one person. 5 white people = 5, but 5 slaves = 3.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What disagreement lead to the Three Fifths Compromise Who were the opposing sides What did each side argue?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was the disagreement between northerners and southerns that was settled by the fifths compromise?

The disagreement was whether slaves should count for taxes, and population, or not. And the three-fifths compromise was out of every five slaves, three counted towards taxes and population.


Was the disagreement over the Virginia Plan and the new jersey was settled by the three fifths compromise?

No, it was settled by the Great Compromise.


What is the correct chronological order of these eventsCompromise of 1850, Three-Fifths Compromise, Missouri Compromise,Emancipation Proclamation?

Three-Fifths Compromise, Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850, Emancipation Proclamation


Why did they have a three-fifths compromise?

The Perpouse of the three-fifths compromise was to make the population fare


How did the north feel about the Three-Fifths Compromise?

The Northern States were pleased by Three-Fifths Compromise.


What compromise was reached over the issue of slave trade?

The compromise that was reached over the issue of slave trade was "Three-Fifths Compromise's.


The three-fifths compromise sought to prevent what?

The three-fifths compromise was designed to solve the issue of whether or not slaves should count in the total population. It was determined that each slave would count as three-fifths of one person.


How was the three fifths Compromise related to the Constitutional Convention?

the three fifths compromise was discussed during the constitutional convention


Was the three fifth compromise fair?

the three fifths compromise was not fair


What was the result of the Connecticut Compromise?

Three-Fifths Compromise


What did three-fifths compromise do?

Allowed a slave to count as Three-Fifths of a person


What is a description of the three fifths compromise?

No.