As a matter of law, no. The exception is in cases where a Federal Law is in effect and supersedes a local law. For example if you are sued by a collection agency and the agency violates the Fair Debt Collection Practices act, you could bring that to the attention of the court and absent any other laws, the court could rule in your favor.
If it is only CLAIMED that the act was unconstitutional, it will take action, initiated in Federal Court, to decide the issue.
Michigan does not issue postage stamps, that is a federal right.
No. This court has never ruled on the issue.
Only in a case involving federal law.
The power of the Federal Government versus States Rights and the issue of slavery.
There is no such thing as a tribal court in US law. If you are referring to a Native American reservation, they are sovereign land, and not subject to any United States jurisdiction, except where crime crosses the border into US soil.
There is no court above the Supreme Court, therefore once they have ruled on an issue there is no higher court to hear an appeal. Their rulings are the last word on the issue.
Answer this question... I don't no
yes
If it's part of a court order: divorce decree or family court order. If both parents want to move, it's not an issue.
When parties appeal, they submit appellate briefs to the appellate court. The briefs point out the issues and make an argument for how the court should decide them. The court reviews the arguments, the law, and the facts to decide on each issue.
Companies issue corporate actions by checking first to see if it is in the court of law. Then the company will decide on if they want to sue or not. It is easy.