Yes as a matter of protocol, any one sitting on a board can motion for an action regardless of the reason for the action. Another person can second that motion for the same reason because the motion is a call for a vote.
It depends on the bylaws of the organization.
No
is this website stupid or is it just me
Typically, to vote for approval of minutes, members of a meeting or organization can make a motion to approve the minutes. Another member then seconds the motion. After that, the chairperson will ask for any discussion or amendments. Once the discussion is closed, a vote is taken, and a majority is usually required to approve the minutes.
Read your governing documents, or refer to the state law under which your association is incorporated to determine your legal requirements. Meeting minutes are best approved at the next board meeting. Best practices dictate that transparency and frequent communication are both key elements to successful communities. The board can decide when to ratify or approve minutes, and decide when to publish them to owners. In the reviewing process, once all board members have reviewed the draft minutes and the minutes are eligible for approval at the next board meeting, the board can circulate 'draft' board minutes, so long as they are clearly labeled as unapproved. As well, several states are working on legislation to enable boards to approve annual meeting minutes at the next board meeting, and not wait until the next annual meeting to approve them.
Pre meeting documents are all the relevant documents that you need to have before a meeting. This may include previous minutes, agenda paper and so on.
Pre meeting documents are all the relevant documents that you need to have before a meeting. This may include previous minutes, agenda paper and so on.
Minutes are something that is written during a meeting of a club or committee. Minutes can either be written in story type format or in an outline form.
Minutes are a record of the work that a committee accomplished. During a meeting and shortly after, participants may have the idea that what happened is clear enough and won't be forgotten. When you start keeping minutes, you will see how untrue that can be. When, during a meeting, a certain course of action is agreed or tasks are assigned, then weeks later when everyone has forgotten everything (don't laugh, this does happen) the minutes are there to remind and eventually inspire people to actually do what the committee exists to do.
No, it is not really appropriate. An EGM should basically consist of an explanation of why the meeting is being held, and then the business it was called for should be dealt with.
are the minutes of the meeting ...
describe correct procedure for calling a meeting
The record of a meeting is called the minutes. The meeting minutes should include: * The original agenda * The participants * The invitees and absent people * Date (and time and location) of meeting * All decisions and why they were reached * All Action Items, along with an owner and schedule The minutes should be sent to: * The participants * The invitees * The people who requested the meeting * People who have action items as a result of the meeting * Relevant managers; those whose teams are affected by the decisions or action items
"Minutes of the meeting were" is the correct phrase to use. "Minutes" in this context refers to a record of what was discussed or decided upon during a meeting, which is considered a plural noun requiring the plural verb "were."