yes
in a different problem, otherwise it's a tautology
This depends on the specific premises and conclusion being evaluated. In general, premises that provide strong and relevant evidence in support of the conclusion can be considered sufficient. However, if there are logical gaps or missing information in the premises that weaken the connection to the conclusion, then the premises may not be sufficient. Critical analysis is necessary to determine whether the premises adequately support the conclusion.
A deductively valid argument is if the premises are true then the conclusion is certainly true, not possibly true. The definition does not say that the conclusion is true.
to derive by reasoning; conclude or judge from premises or evidence -Dictionary.com Simple terms it means creating a conclusion based on everything you've learned from some sort of experiment.
booboo penis
Evidence is data from an experiment which is used to verify or reject the original hypothesis in the conclusion. Evidence is gathered through the scientific method.
conclusions that are used as a premises in a continuing chain of reasoning
These types of words are called conclusion indicators. They signal to the listener or reader that the argument is reaching a conclusion based on the presented premises. Examples of conclusion indicators include "thus," "therefore," and "so".
To add a premises and conclusion to an incomplete argument, first identify the main point being made. Then, find additional supporting reasons or evidence that lead to that main point to form the premises. Finally, state a clear conclusion that follows logically from the premises provided. Make sure the premises adequately support the conclusion for a strong and coherent argument.
A syllogism includes two premises and a conclusion. The premises take the form of statement about classes of things and the conclusion is a similar statement which is necessarily implied by the premises.
This depends on the specific premises and conclusion being evaluated. In general, premises that provide strong and relevant evidence in support of the conclusion can be considered sufficient. However, if there are logical gaps or missing information in the premises that weaken the connection to the conclusion, then the premises may not be sufficient. Critical analysis is necessary to determine whether the premises adequately support the conclusion.
A conclusion.
A strong argument is supported by reasoning and evidence, is logically sound, and addresses counterarguments effectively. A weak argument lacks evidence, relies on emotion or fallacious reasoning, or fails to address opposing views adequately. It's important to evaluate the validity of the premises, the logical structure, and the relevance of the evidence when determining the strength of an argument.
True. A valid argument can have a false conclusion if the premises logically lead to that conclusion even though it is not true. Validity in logic refers to the structure of the argument, regardless of the truth or falsity of the premises or conclusion.
Deductive reasoning proceeds from known true premises to a logically necessary true conclusion. This type of reasoning guarantees the truth of the conclusion if the premises are true.
Premises has two definitions:Premises can refer to a house or building, along with its land and outbuildings, usually occupied by a business or being used for a formal or official purpose.'Alcohol was not to be served on the premises during the party.'A premise refers to a statement or proposition which is followed by a form of conclusion.'The premise was followed by an affirmative conclusion.'
logic
Yes, an argument with true premises and a true conclusion can still be invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises. Invalidity concerns the structure of the argument rather than the truth of the statements involved.