Yes, a murder victim can be buried before an arrest is made. When it is determined that a person was murdered, medical examiners, usually do a very thorough examination of the body before releasing it for burial; they also know what samples to keep from the body for further or future testing such as tissue sample, hair samples, samples of body fluids, etc. A problem arises when someone is buried before murder is suspected. When that is the case, authorities get a court order to have the body exhumed and a forensic examination is done. It's not as ideal as doing it before burial but the sciences are getting much better at finding information even from this source.
Biological evidence is much more likely to degrade and become unusable before physical evidence does.
If your defense is that you were falsely arrested, it is unlikely - unless you or your attorney can present some evidence to The State that you were CLEARLY not involved in whatever you're charged with. You realize, of course, that 99% of all defendants claim they were falsely arrested, don't you?
Before modern forensic science techniques, criminals were usually caught through witness testimonies, confessions, or physical evidence like fingerprints, footprints, and bloodstains. Investigative methods such as surveillance, stakeouts, and informants were also commonly used to apprehend suspects.
When a search for evidence is contemplated, the search needs to be done in a timely manner before the evidence is destroyed, disposed of, or moved. The state typically has years to accumulate enough probable cause to arrest someone for a crime.
The discovery process means the process by which the prosecution and defense present their evidence for each others' perusal before the trial starts. The evidence can be challenged at this stage by motions to suppress.
No.Additional: If the police have probable cause to arrest you for the crime they can begin gathering and/or preserving evidence of the offense immediately without awaiting the formal court charging documents.
The US Supreme Court ruling in the case of Miranda v. Arizona established this right.However, there is no requirement that you be advised by the arresting officer, immediately upon your arrest, only that you be read your rights before actual interrogation about the particular offense commences. .If there is any question about the admissibility of the evidence against you, your defense attorney will raise it at the appropraite time.
It was presented at his trial. As I've said before, Peterson had a top-notch defense team and they put on a vigorous defense. But the fact is the case against Peterson was so strong it could not be overcome.
No. They prefer to surprise you. - A.
before arrest he has to get permit ion from district collector.
Yes and no. If the Police have a search warrant or your consent, they may search you. If they have neither and you're not under arrest, then no. This would be a 4th amendment violation and any evidence obtained through the illegal search would be suppressed. They may only search you incident to arrest, which means after they've verbally informed you that you're under arrest.
Probable cause is typically established when there is enough evidence to suggest that a crime has been committed or is about to be committed. This evidence can come from witness statements, physical evidence, surveillance, or other investigative techniques. Probable cause is required by law before a search or arrest can be conducted.