The US Supreme Court ruling in the case of Miranda v. Arizona established this right.
However, there is no requirement that you be advised by the arresting officer, immediately upon your arrest, only that you be read your rights before actual interrogation about the particular offense commences. .
If there is any question about the admissibility of the evidence against you, your defense attorney will raise it at the appropraite time.
The US Supreme Court.
The case would have to rely on physical evidence (if any), and/or witness statements.
Opening statements by the lawyers at a trial are not evidence. The statements indicate to the jury what the lawyers believe the evidence will show. For further information on how a trial proceeds, please see the related link below.
Yes, if the person incriminates themselves in a crime or if there is enough evidence to support an arrest.
"Follow up statements with evidence" means providing supporting facts, data, or examples to strengthen your statements or claims. It involves presenting proof or documentation that lends credibility to your words and helps convince others of the accuracy or validity of your argument or position. By including evidence, you provide a solid foundation for your statements and make your case more compelling and persuasive.
No, biased statements are not supported by evidence.
"I agree with absolutely everything you've said, except for your first statement."The dock master was asked to give a statement regarding the damage to the wharf.
The witness provided a corroborating statement that supported the victim's account of the incident.
Evidence is never admitted during the opening statement, and the judges usually admonish the jury specifically that opening statements are only argument and not evidence. However, prosecutors will often show to the jury some evidence that they intend to introduce during the trial, but if for some reason that evidence is not introduced during the trial, the defendant can move for a mistrial at the close of the prosecution's case.
Most statements made by counsel can be considered by jurors as evidence. In some cases, the judge will instruct you whether you should listen and consider this as evidence or not.
A hearsay rule that allows the acts and statements of one conspirator, as long as they were done or said during or after the conspiracy, to be admitted into evidence at the trial of another conspirator, even if done or said in the defendant's absence. In federal court and in some states, the act or statement is admissible even if done or said after the conspirators were arrested and in custody
One detective was marking evidence for future identification while the other questioned the witness.
a questioned specimen is evidence collected at the scene of the crime and a known specimen is something from a known person or source.