Corroborating means supporting a statement or theory with information. The author provided corroborating statements and evidence for their non-fiction book.
The witness provided a corroborating statement that supported the victim's account of the incident.
The witness's testimony corroborated the evidence presented by the prosecution, strengthening the case against the defendant.
This sentence is a declarative sentence as it makes a statement.
Corroborating a testimony means providing additional evidence or testimony that supports or confirms the validity of the original testimony. It helps to strengthen the credibility and reliability of the original testimony by showing that it is consistent with other information or accounts.
A de novo sentence is a sentence imposed by a court without considering any prior sentence or recommendation. It is usually given when a previous sentence is determined to be invalid or improper, requiring a new sentence to be issued.
A declaratory sentence is a type of sentence that makes a statement or declaration. It ends with a period and is used to convey information or opinion in a straightforward manner.
Corroborating just means giving support to, or confirming. Her corroborating evidence helped the police find the real criminal.
The evidence against the defendant was so corroborating that he's most certain to be convicted.
yes
The witness's testimony corroborated the evidence presented by the prosecution, strengthening the case against the defendant.
Corroborating it with other pieces of evidence
Because of the difficulty of corroborating the accuracyof the information.
When it is corroborating or corroborated.
Corroborating sources allows a political scientist to verify the accuracy and credibility of their information, ensuring that they can draw accurate conclusions and make informed decisions in their research. It adds strength to their arguments and enhances the overall reliability of their findings in the field of political science.
determine whether an assertion made by one source is likely to be true.
Corroborating sources in political science allows researchers to verify information, strengthen the credibility of their findings, and support more robust and accurate analysis of political phenomena. By comparing information from multiple sources, researchers can reduce bias and ensure the reliability of their conclusions.
The three main processes of historical thinking skills are sourcing, contextualizing, and corroborating. Sourcing involves analyzing the origin of historical sources, contextualizing focuses on understanding the historical context in which events occurred, and corroborating involves comparing multiple sources to establish the reliability and accuracy of information.
Some synonyms for proving include illustrating, demonstrating, justifying, corroborating, affirming, verifying, and substantiating.