yes
see my profile
No, the support of children is the sole responsibility of the biological parent(s) not a new wife or husband. The income of the new spouse could be affected if the couple have joint accounts that are subject to attachment for child support arrearages or other judgment actions.
No one assumes the responsibility for ongoing support payments. If there are back monies owed, a claim can be made against his estate. That will have to be resolved prior to inheritances being distributed.
No, child support is his responsibility only.
No. She has no legal responsibility to support the children. Only the biological parents have any responsibility for child support.
It should not be. The responsibility for paying the child support for his children lies with him, and should be based on his income.
No. Only the biological parents are responsible for the support of their minor children. I have a different answer: If the parent is being supported by his/her spouse then yes, the new spouse has to pay for child support. Some parents tried to get out of paying child support by not working and letting their new spouse support them but that is illegal. The house hold income is counted.
Only biological parents are required to support their children.Only biological parents are required to support their children.Only biological parents are required to support their children.Only biological parents are required to support their children.
Yes. I am in Georgia and I adopted my niece. The biological parents were relinquished of all rights to the child, even child support responsibility.
It depends on the court's interpretation of your relationship with the child. see link
This assumes that "back" support means "past-due" (i.e., unpaid) support. He has to pay in accordance with the order(s). His disability status does not exempt him from following the order.
No, only the biological parents pay for their child.
Only the biological parents pay for their children, not the new spouses.