The answer is NO! A computer cannot replace human skills, because:
we need humans to teach us so that they can explain the slightest thing in many ways for one to understand.
In a class if a student asks a question, can a computer answer it. The students need someone with experience and not a machine of some sort who has no feelings.
Yes, Robots would make grading faster and teaching better, also the unemployed teachers could make learning software and teach the things that are too complex and hard for the robots too. They could make tests and also improve the community even more than they could if they were teaching.
no because teachers have better abilities
DISAGREE!
generally , in a classroom setting, a physical teacher is best. but at home, computers are a very good learning tool. some people just learn better by having someone there to show them how to do stuff.
CAD programs
yes
the numbers is 16500
The sentence 'Computers and printers are standard equipment in most classrooms' is a compound sentence because it has more than one subject, "Computers and printers".
because they so loudly in the classrooms....
This is unknown. Not all teachers update the maps. You would have to visit every single school to ask the teachers how often the maps are updated in the classrooms. This would be a nearly impossible task.
Very open and just think classrooms in New Zealand with less computers, desks, whiteboards and stationary. Its hard life in Samoa.
It is unknown if computers will replace books in the future.
by 1989 nearly every school district across America had computers in the classrooms. But computer usage began prior to 1975. Colleges used mainframes to do statistical problems with and simple administrative jobs.
There were none in the classrooms where I attended, but I can't say about the offices for sure.