Anybody who wants to can be responsible financially.
If they don't want to, the fact that they're listed on the birth certificate is essentially meaningless. In many places, the mother can list whoever she wants as the father on the birth certificate; she's not required to actually prove it. Courts do not necessarily assume that it's correct, and particularly if the person listed can prove he's not the biological father, it would be a travesty of justice if they forced him to pay child support anyway.
No, no, no. A man's name can be on the birth certificate only if he signs an acknowledgment of paternity. This makes him the child's father until/unless a court rules otherwise.
No, the father on the birth certificate is financially responsible unless proven that he's not the father by DNA. About 12 years ago in the state of NJ The court ordered me to pay child support to the biological father (Dna test showed I was not the biological father) The court called me the psychological father so in the courts opinion I was her father. And like the biological Mother he also drank it away.
YES,THEY SHOULD. A CUSTODIAL MOTHER GET'S CHILD SUPPORT WHY WOULDNT THE FATHER. IT WORK'S BOTH WAY'S.
No, they have no control over a 21 year old son and are not responsible.
Yes, once paternity is established the biological father of the child can be ordered by the court to financially support that child.
If what is meant by the term "legitimate" pertains to whether the father is responsible for supporting the child, then the answer would be yes. Once paternity has been established either by the signing of the birth certificate, a declaration of parentage or by DNA testing the father can be held responsible for support of the child and likewise he is entitled to petition for custodial or visitation rights.
the father is there for support. financially, and emotionally.
AnswerNo, you need to send a copy of the death certificate to the credit card company. You are not responsible for your father's debt.
Paul's mother says that Paul's father is not financially successful because he is not lucky.
In many states he can be held responsible, regardless of paternity. see link below
As far as I know, the legal obligations are the same as if you were married to the mother for 20 years before she got pregnant. If you are the father, then you are the father and that means you are legally and financially responsible for that child.
It would seem logical that she would be responsible for her own medical bills. However, if your father is still married to her, he may have substantial responsibility for her medical bills. If your father has died but there are provisions in his will that call for portions of his estate to support her medical needs, or if there is insurance covering her, then others may have some responsibility.
Yes, there's a 30% rate of paternity fraud where a mother gets a man whose not the father to sign the birth certificate.