Police officers may take pictures without permission to the extent that a member of the public may lawfully do the same. Additionally, police officers may take pictures in any place where they are lawfully present, and may only do so for lawful purposes. For example, a police officer executing a search warrant may take pictures for use as evidence.
If you take a car without permission and the police tow it the owners do have to pay the fee for the wrecker service and the impound fee.
it can take up the case on the direction of the court, direction of the Director General Police or the Government,
I don't think they can, even if they are law enforcements, it would be wrong for a Police officer to do that.
yes yes
i sincerely doubt it, i havn't got one but silent camera phones got banned cause of perverts taking pictures of girls in public without the girls permission so...
As long as you capture the picture from the street it is legal. You only need permission if you are taking the pictures on private property.
No. However, if they are on your property without permission when they take the picture, that could be considered trespassing.
I don't think that a real estate agency has any right to take pictures of an occupied apartment without that occupant's permission. If this happened to you then you could sue for damages. Of course there could be an exception to this rule if it's written in your lease. But in my opinion that would be considered unconscionable.
No. I do it all the time. Yes; to copy (including downloading), alter, distribute (including uploading), or display images you found online, you need permission from the copyright holder or an exemption in the law.
no
Legally, in most cases, yes. Ethically, no, not without permission.
no!