No, and many jurisdictions take denial of visitation very seriously (as they should!).
A person can sue for almost any reason. Whether or not it is a justifiable case is usually the question. Was there emotional and/or physical injury to the plaintiff? Was there any monetary loss? What purpose if any would litigation serve. Lawsuits are not, as a rule timely, inexpensive or even the solution to the problem(s). A counselor/mediator however, might be more helpful.
There will be no change to he judges.
Missouri's legal statutes do not specify a period of time when abandonment occurs, however most judges in that state concur that abandonment has occurred when the non-custodial parent has left the child and provided no means of support for the child for a period of six months. In those cases, the non-custodial parent may petition the court for termination of parental rights of the non-custodial parent. However, if the other parent contests the petition, then you are unlikely to prevail since the courts prefer that both parents are part of the child's life. The best course of action is probably to go through the normal process of filing a motion with the court to establish child support and visitation. Then you can receive support for your child and have scheduled visitation set up. If the parent has no interest in the child then he is unlikely to even use the visitation.
If by "affect" it is meant will such a situation harm the case of the biological mother pertaining to custodial issues, the answer is a "maybe". Judges are concerned with the welfare of the child/children and nothing else. If the "new boyfriend" is a live-in then it could be a bearing on how the judge will rule, usually dependent upon the character and/or living environment. The majority of judges try to be fair when it pertains to such a situation, but it is not unheard of to get a biased judge who favors traditional values such as marriage.
If there is an order of visitation it must be followed unless to do so would place the child in a position of endangerment. If the custodial parent believes the child would be in jeopardy the custodial parent should contact the court immediately to request a change in the visitation order. The custodial parent should never disobey a court order of visitation simply because the child does not wish to see the non custodial parent. To do so could be seen as contempt of court and serious consequences could arise. If there is no court order the custodial parent can decide whether or not visitation should be allowed and if allowed the terms under which it will occur.
Supreme Court Judges with the consent of congress
In difficult custody battles, it's best to keep a journal detailing things such as this. This can help when providing facts to the court showing a lack of interest in following any visitation agreements. Non-custodial parents can petition the court requesting a change in custody, but Judges do look at the facts, and take what is called status quo into account.
If the circumstances have changed and it is now in the child's best interest for the visitation papers to be changed then, yes, another judge can over rule another judges ruling.
A person can sue for almost any reason. Whether or not it is a justifiable case is usually the question. Was there emotional and/or physical injury to the plaintiff? Was there any monetary loss? What purpose if any would litigation serve. Lawsuits are not, as a rule timely, inexpensive or even the solution to the problem(s). A counselor/mediator however, might be more helpful.
parliament members
There will be no change to he judges.
Missouri's legal statutes do not specify a period of time when abandonment occurs, however most judges in that state concur that abandonment has occurred when the non-custodial parent has left the child and provided no means of support for the child for a period of six months. In those cases, the non-custodial parent may petition the court for termination of parental rights of the non-custodial parent. However, if the other parent contests the petition, then you are unlikely to prevail since the courts prefer that both parents are part of the child's life. The best course of action is probably to go through the normal process of filing a motion with the court to establish child support and visitation. Then you can receive support for your child and have scheduled visitation set up. If the parent has no interest in the child then he is unlikely to even use the visitation.
Anywhere that issues marriage licenses.
The Senate has the power to 'advise and consent' to the appointments of the President. These include federal judges and cabinet members.
Try visiting Arkansas or swimming to Cuba.
Alot plays in on this factor. Like Income, Ability of Transportation. Most Judges Rule 50/50 if the both parents are equal in income and transportation Most Will say If you life 32 Miles apart Pick a meeting place 16 miles in the middle
No. This is a very bad idea to go against a court order regarding child visitation rights. The custodial parent sometimes interferes with child visitation and forces the non-custodial parent to seek alternative ways to maintain the parent-child relationship. For the non-custodial parent whose right has been denied there are mild, moderate and severe enforcements of the right to visitation. * Mild enforcements are: filing a police report, modifying the visitation judgment to exactly specify the time and place of visitation, award make-up visitation and family therapy or mediation * Moderate enforcements are: supervised visitation, having a third party responsible for overseeing visitation and award of attorney's fees * Severe enforcements are: contempt proceedings, court permission to withhold child support, change of custody and suing the other parent for hindering visitation The problems with enforcement is that most judges are unwilling to take the steps necessary to enforce a visitation order equally to a child support order. When Public Law 12 was passed in the 80s creating the Federal Commission of Child Support, as a part of the requirements to receive federal funding, the states were to set up programs for the enforcement of visitation orders. So far no state has done that. Missouri did pass RSMO 565.156 §5 in 1989, making it a Class D felony to violate court ordered visitation, but county prosecutors have flatly refused to enforce it. 565.156. 1. A person commits the crime of child abduction if he or she: (5) Having legal custody of the child pursuant to a valid court order, removes, takes, detains, conceals or entices away that child within or without the state, without good cause, and with the intent to deprive the custody or visitation rights of another person, without obtaining written consent as is provided under section 452.377, RSMo. 2. Child abduction is a class D felony. According to the US Dept. of Health & Human Services study, "Survey of Absent Parents" over 60% of mothers regularly violate the access rights of fathers. Further, they are successful in cutting off all contact between the children and their fathers within five years. Unlike child support, mothers are not jailed, even with multiple Contempt of Court rulings against them for violating the fathers' court ordered visitation rights. The best defense is a good offense, to have a motion to change custody ready the moment a judge rules a parent in contempt of a visitation order. see link