No, because war is that special thing that make us special, and is what make us better than animals.
Alternatively, there are certainly ways by which nations or factions within nations can attempt to peacefully resolve their disputes with eachother. People can make compromises and can be considerate of the concerns of others. For example, even the bitterest of enemies, the Palestinians and Israelis, were able to sign the Oslo Peace Accord; the fact that they have both violated that accord doesn't mean that it would have been impossible to make it work. It can be made to work if the people involved are truly committed to making it work. The United Nations was supposed to prevent war, although it has obviously failed to do so, but that doesn't mean that we might not be able to make the United Nations more effective in the future. War is, after all, something that people choose to engage in, therefore people could also choose differently.
handwashing
It prevented Europe from socially or economically recovering from the war
Roosevelt's internationalist policy may not have prevented the war. Earlier U.S. involvement may, however, have made the war shorter and less destructive.
the first battle of marne
the first battle of marne
No
handwashing
No
It prevented Europe from socially or economically recovering from the war
Ignorance...
Buchanan could have prevented war by not allowing the Confederate to separate from the Union. Buchanan could have also acted differently on issues of slavery, especially in Kansas.
the US helped many nations at war
If communist North Vietnam did not try to conquer South Vietnam, the war would have been prevented.
True
World War I
Neutrality laws
Neutrality laws