Yes. It could be written off as business expenses before the debt was collected and adjusted on tax forms afterwards. It really depends on if it was reported as a loss or an expenditure attributed to business dealings. A prudent person would probably leave it as a business expense write off, to avoid the possibility of haggling with the IRS.
If rent is paid for any activity which is directly related with the primary business activity then rent is not other expense, but if rent is paid for activity which is not directly related to primary business activity then it is other expense.
Absolutely not. Most banks don't even allow the authorized user to get basic info from the account, such as balance or recent transactions.
Yes
Miscellaneous expenses means small sundry expenses of business while other expenses means expenses which are not directly related to the primary operations of business.
Primary purpose of balance sheet is to show the overall performance of business from inception to til date.
If rent is paid for any activity which is directly related with the primary business activity then rent is not other expense, but if rent is paid for activity which is not directly related to primary business activity then it is other expense.
I'm trying to follow what your really saying: Presumably there is a "primary" ...that would be the one who applied for the credit and signed the agreements to pay the charges. That person requested a card for another person to use, under the primaries credit agreement, and agreed to be responsible for the charges that person made...the credit card company went along with this request...but it was NOT extending any credit, or even had any type of agreement with this other authorized signer. All charges by that person are the responsibility of the primary...the debt from using the card is not to the second (authorized) person...and any debt (if there is one you can prove), would be by the authorized user to the primary...if they had an agreement that the authorized would pay for any use. The primary would be a creditor of the authorized in that bankruptcy. The credit card company isn't a part of it...the debt remains with the primary...regardless of any payment or not he gets from the authorized party or their bankrutcy. And alternatively, if the authorized person made charges and the primary goes BK, that charges are part of the primaries BK, (and may be discharged). Again, if there is an agreement that the authorized would pay those charges, that "receivable" or asset to the Primary must be reported as such in his BK filing.
If you were only an authorized user and not a joint account holder, you should never be responsible for the primary account holder's debt.
If a credit card is used by an individual authorized to use the account and that person was not aware the primary acct holder was deceased when the card was used, the card company will probably include the charges in the final bill submitted to the estate rep. If death was known they will hold the authorised user responsible for the charges. If the user was not authorized and knew about the death of the holder it was fraud and criminal charges should be filed.
No. Authorized Users are NOT liable for the debt, only the PRIMARY on the account is liable.
When adding an authorized user to your account, you are agreeing to any and all charges that person places on the account. If the authorized user chooses to abuse the account, such as making purchases beyond the amount that you are able to pay or by exceeding the limit of the card, the negative effects goes against the primary users credit. The authorized users credit is not affected at all and they are not responsible for payments. So be careful who you chose to add to your card.
Ownership is an issue not covered by credit laws. There may be other statutes that deal with this issue. "Possession is nine tenths of the law" comes to mind. Creditors are only concerned with the money due them. An authorized user does not qualify as a "debtor" under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and therefore never has liability. The primary card holder would have liability regardless of who purchased the items/services and who has "ownership".
Authorized users are not responsible for repaying cc charges. Unless they are a spouse of the account holder and live in a community property state. I work at a credit card company and an authorized user is just someone who is able to make charges on the account. The primary cardholderand/or the joint cardholder would be the one responsible for the bill. The payment history may be reported to your credit bureau though. That does happen with some companies.
An authorized user on a credit card can be responsible on an account in which the primary card holder passes. The creditor looks at the situation as the authorized card holder was able to make purchases with the account, and should be held liable, even in the event of the primary's death.
Absolutely not. Most banks don't even allow the authorized user to get basic info from the account, such as balance or recent transactions.
Yes florist is the primary business.
AN authorized user cannot be held responsible for a primary holder's debt in any case. Only a joint holder can be liable for the debt. YES OF COURSE