answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

I am happy to join with you today in what will go down in history as the greatest demonstration for freedom in the history of our nation. Five score years ago, a great American, in whose symbolic shadow we stand today, signed the Emancipation Proclamation. This momentous decree came as a great beacon light of hope to millions of Negro slaves who had been seared in the flames of withering injustice. It came as a joyous daybreak to end the long night of their captivity. But one hundred years later, the Negro still is not free. One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination. One hundred years later, the Negro lives on a lonely island of poverty in the midst of a vast ocean of material prosperity. One hundred years later, the Negro is still languishing in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land. So we have come here today to dramatize a shameful condition. In a sense we have come to our nation's capital to cash a check. When the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It is obvious today that America has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. Instead of honoring this sacred obligation, America has given the Negro people a bad check, a check which has come back marked "insufficient funds." But we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. We refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. So we have come to cash this check - a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and the security of justice. We have also come to this hallowed spot to remind America of the fierce urgency of now. This is no time to engage in the luxury of cooling off or to take the tranquilizing drug of gradualism. Now is the time to make real the promises of democracy. Now is the time to rise from the dark and desolate valley of segregation to the sunlit path of racial justice. Now is the time to lift our nation from the quick sands of racial injustice to the solid rock of brotherhood. Now is the time to make justice a reality for all of God's children. It would be fatal for the nation to overlook the urgency of the moment. This sweltering summer of the Negro's legitimate discontent will not pass until there is an invigorating autumn of freedom and equality. Nineteen sixty-three is not an end, but a beginning. Those who hope that the Negro needed to blow off steam and will now be content will have a rude awakening if the nation returns to business as usual. There will be neither rest nor tranquility in America until the Negro is granted his citizenship rights. The whirlwinds of revolt will continue to shake the foundations of our nation until the bright day of justice emerges. But there is something that I must say to my people who stand on the warm threshold which leads into the palace of justice. In the process of gaining our rightful place we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred. We must forever conduct our struggle on the high plane of dignity and discipline. We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force. The marvelous new militancy which has engulfed the Negro community must not lead us to a distrust of all white people, for many of our white brothers, as evidenced by their presence here today, have come to realize that their destiny is tied up with our destiny. They have come to realize that their freedom is inextricably bound to our freedom. We cannot walk alone. As we walk, we must make the pledge that we shall always march ahead. We cannot turn back. There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, "When will you be satisfied?" We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality. We can never be satisfied, as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities. We cannot be satisfied as long as the Negro's basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one. We can never be satisfied as long as our children are stripped of their selfhood and robbed of their dignity by signs stating "For Whites Only". We cannot be satisfied as long as a Negro in Mississippi cannot vote and a Negro in New York believes he has nothing for which to vote. No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream. I am not unmindful that some of you have come here out of great trials and tribulations. Some of you have come fresh from narrow jail cells. Some of you have come from areas where your quest for freedom left you battered by the storms of persecution and staggered by the winds of police brutality. You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the faith that unearned suffering is redemptive. Go back to Mississippi, go back to Alabama, go back to South Carolina, go back to Georgia, go back to Louisiana, go back to the slums and ghettos of our northern cities, knowing that somehow this situation can and will be changed. Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. I say to you today, my friends, so even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. It is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream. I Have a Dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all men are created equal." I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the sons of former slaves and the sons of former slave owners will be able to sit down together at the table of brotherhood. I have a dream that one day even the state of Mississippi, a state sweltering with the heat of injustice, sweltering with the heat of oppression, will be transformed into an oasis of freedom and justice. I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character. I have a dream today. I have a dream that one day, down in Alabama, with its vicious racists, with its governor having his lips dripping with the words of interposition and nullification; one day right there in Alabama, little black boys and black girls will be able to join hands with little white boys and white girls as sisters and brothers. I have a dream today. I have a dream that one day every valley shall be exalted, every hill and mountain shall be made low, the rough places will be made plain, and the crooked places will be made straight, and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together. This is our hope. This is the faith that I go back to the South with. With this faith we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith we will be able to transform the jangling discords of our nation into a beautiful symphony of brotherhood. With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day. This will be the day when all of God's children will be able to sing with a new meaning, "My country, 'tis of thee, sweet land of liberty, of thee I sing. Land where my fathers died, land of the pilgrim's pride, from every mountainside, let freedom ring." And if America is to be a great nation this must become true. So let freedom ring from the prodigious hilltops of New Hampshire. Let freedom ring from the mighty mountains of New York. Let freedom ring from the heightening Alleghenies of Pennsylvania! Let freedom ring from the snowcapped Rockies of Colorado! Let freedom ring from the curvaceous slopes of California! But not only that; let freedom ring from Stone Mountain of Georgia! Let freedom ring from Lookout Mountain of Tennessee! Let freedom ring from every hill and molehill of Mississippi. From every mountainside, let freedom ring. And when this happens, when we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, "Free at last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!"

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Can you give me a copy of ''I have a dream'' by Martin Luther King?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

What is the statue of Martin Luther King called?

it is call the monument of peace and respected tht is tolally right copy it down


What was the mood of Martin Luther King Jr in the you have a dream speech?

if you are delievering the speech dont try to copy him exactly. go with what is comfortable and suites you best. trust youll look better. and practice daily you dont want to miss one day and you'll be perfect. Im sure if youre that interested you can find the video online or in the library and study it for yourself


What was the name of the document Martin Luther posted on the doors of Castle Church?

Luther posted what has become known as his 95 Theses. These listed his concerns at some practices in the Catholic Church, especially the selling of indulgences to gain release from purgatory. A copy of them can be seen at the link below.


What church practices did Martin Luther become outraged by?

Attached below is a English copy of Martin Luther's 95 Theses which contain the Church practices that he was questioning, I think "outraged" might be a bit over the top. Most the practices he was questioning were connected with indulgences, pardons, and confession, however, a quick look through his 95 Theses even by a first year seminarian would quickly reveal that Martin Luther really didn't know what he was talking about, many of the things that he asked for were already Church teaching. I believe that the practice that Martin Luther was most upset about was the fact that the Church asked him to lead a moral life as Luther spent the rest of his life trying to justify why he didn't have to repent and reform his life.


Who owns the paper copy of MLK's I have a dream speech?

george raveling

Related questions

Can you please show me a copy of Martin Luther King's Speech 'I Have a Dream?

No one really knows so much about his speech.


What is the value of a Martin Luther King 45 record of I have a dream speech?

I don't know but I have one also. I saw a copy just like it at the museum. I'd like to find out also.


What is the statue of Martin Luther King called?

it is call the monument of peace and respected tht is tolally right copy it down


Is there a copy of Martin Luther King Jr's obituary on the internet?

Yes, check www.nytimes.com/packages/html/.../mlk-obit.pdfThis is a copy from April 5, 1968 New York Times.


Was there a copy martin luther's wedding ring made?

Yes, James Avery carries them. They are very popular with a ride range of Christians.


What is Martin Luther King Jr.'s real name?

His name was Michael Luther King Jr. at first then he changed it to MartinTo this day, questions remain over the names of both Martin Luther King, Jr. andhis father: what names they were given by their parents, what names appeared ontheir birth records, and when (if ever) they changed their names are subjects of somemurkiness. According to an account Martin Luther King, Sr. gave to a New York Postreporter in 1957, he had always intended his son's name to be Martin Luther, and theappearance of the name 'Michael' in his son's birth records was a mistake due toconfusion over his own name:I had been known as Michael Luther King or "Mike" up until I was 22 ... whenone day my father, James Albert King, told me: 'You aren't named Mike orMichael either. Your name is Martin Luther King. Your mother just called youMike for short.' I was elated to know that I had really been named for thegreat leader of the Protestant Reformation, but there was no way ofknowing if papa had made a mistake after all. Neither of my parents couldread or write and they kept no record of Negro births in our backwoodscounty ... I gladly accepted Martin Luther King as my real name and whenM.L. was born, I proudly named him Martin Luther King, Jr. But it was notuntil 1934, when I was seeking my first passport ... that I found out thatDr. Johnson, who delivered M.L., had listed him in the city records asMichael Luther King, Jr., because he thought that was my real name.No records documenting a formal name change for either King yet have beenuncovered, so in a strict legal sense one might say that Martin Luther King, Jr.'s nameofficially remained "Michael" until his death. However, what constitutes a "legal name"can be quite fluid. My own mother, born in the same era asMartin Luther King, Jr., was raised by people other than herbirth parents from an early age and did not know her realfirst and middle names. (Indeed, she did not learn whichnames were actually listed on her birth record until Iobtained a copy of the document for her when she was inher mid-50s.) Nonetheless, the first and middle names sheadopted in place of the unknown real ones were listed onevery government-issued record pertaining to her createdduring her adult lifetime (e.g., marriage license, driver'slicense, Social Security card, children's birth certificates) andwere therefore her "legal" names every bit as much (if notmoreso) than the ones that appeared on her birth record.In any case, whether Martin Luther King, Sr. gave a true account of the issue in 1957(i.e., that both he and his son were officially named 'Martin' by their fathers but called'Michael' through confusion or mistake) or simply decided in his adulthood that hepreferred he and his son be known as 'Martin' instead of 'Michael,' the name change wasnot (as suggested above) an affectation on the part of Martin Luther King, Jr.; it wassomething decided for him by his father while he was still very young.*Snopes


Who was Gandhi and what methods did Martin Luther King copy from him?

Gandhi was Assn amazing Indian leader whip almost single handedly was able to get the british to end their occupation of India, via his revolutionary style of non violent protest. King only got the idea after visiting India in 1959


What was the mood of Martin Luther King Jr in the you have a dream speech?

if you are delievering the speech dont try to copy him exactly. go with what is comfortable and suites you best. trust youll look better. and practice daily you dont want to miss one day and you'll be perfect. Im sure if youre that interested you can find the video online or in the library and study it for yourself


Where can you find a copy of the speech given by Martin Luther King in the movie Driving Miss Daisy?

Dr. King delivered that speech on January 27, 1965, at the Dinkier Plaza Hotel in Atlanta, Georgia. The occasion was a dinner given to honor him as a Nobel Prize recipient. If no one at WikiAnswers can provide a source for the speech, then a reference librarian may be able to use the date, the occasion, the place, and the excerpts that you copy from the sound track to find a copy of the complete text.


What is Martin Luther King real name?

His name was Michael Luther King Jr. at first then he changed it to MartinTo this day, questions remain over the names of both Martin Luther King, Jr. andhis father: what names they were given by their parents, what names appeared ontheir birth records, and when (if ever) they changed their names are subjects of somemurkiness. According to an account Martin Luther King, Sr. gave to a New York Postreporter in 1957, he had always intended his son's name to be Martin Luther, and theappearance of the name 'Michael' in his son's birth records was a mistake due toconfusion over his own name:I had been known as Michael Luther King or "Mike" up until I was 22 ... whenone day my father, James Albert King, told me: 'You aren't named Mike orMichael either. Your name is Martin Luther King. Your mother just called youMike for short.' I was elated to know that I had really been named for thegreat leader of the Protestant Reformation, but there was no way ofknowing if papa had made a mistake after all. Neither of my parents couldread or write and they kept no record of Negro births in our backwoodscounty ... I gladly accepted Martin Luther King as my real name and whenM.L. was born, I proudly named him Martin Luther King, Jr. But it was notuntil 1934, when I was seeking my first passport ... that I found out thatDr. Johnson, who delivered M.L., had listed him in the city records asMichael Luther King, Jr., because he thought that was my real name.No records documenting a formal name change for either King yet have beenuncovered, so in a strict legal sense one might say that Martin Luther King, Jr.'s nameofficially remained "Michael" until his death. However, what constitutes a "legal name"can be quite fluid. My own mother, born in the same era asMartin Luther King, Jr., was raised by people other than herbirth parents from an early age and did not know her realfirst and middle names. (Indeed, she did not learn whichnames were actually listed on her birth record until Iobtained a copy of the document for her when she was inher mid-50s.) Nonetheless, the first and middle names sheadopted in place of the unknown real ones were listed onevery government-issued record pertaining to her createdduring her adult lifetime (e.g., marriage license, driver'slicense, Social Security card, children's birth certificates) andwere therefore her "legal" names every bit as much (if notmoreso) than the ones that appeared on her birth record.In any case, whether Martin Luther King, Sr. gave a true account of the issue in 1957(i.e., that both he and his son were officially named 'Martin' by their fathers but called'Michael' through confusion or mistake) or simply decided in his adulthood that hepreferred he and his son be known as 'Martin' instead of 'Michael,' the name change wasnot (as suggested above) an affectation on the part of Martin Luther King, Jr.; it wassomething decided for him by his father while he was still very young.*Snopes


What was the name of the document Martin Luther posted on the doors of Castle Church?

Luther posted what has become known as his 95 Theses. These listed his concerns at some practices in the Catholic Church, especially the selling of indulgences to gain release from purgatory. A copy of them can be seen at the link below.


What is the value of Martin Lurther King Jr 15 cent stamp?

United States Scott #1771. You can purchase a used copy for 20 cents. A mint, or unused, copy would be $1.20.