Yes.
Rear brakes do not have to be replaced too often. It's really hard to tell without looking at it. What you can do is to replace front brakes and test drive it, if you feel that your car brakes works just fine you do not need to replace rear brake shoes.
No. You will only need to replace the brake shoes if they are worn down. Generally the front brakes do 70% of braking leaving the rear with 30%, which will cause the front pads to wear first. What is important however is that you replace either front brakes or rear brakes as a set. i.e. if you're replacing the front brakes do the right and left side.
front front - rear rear.
Front or rear.. disc or drum type..??????????
Usually the rear pads or brake shoes depending on whether or not the back brakes are disc or drum brakes will last 2 times longer the the front brakes. 75% of your braking is done by the front brakes. For example, if you have 60,000 miles and your front pads need to be replaced the rear ones will only be about 1/2 worn out.
There are reasons that front breaks are more expensive. It may be more expensive to replace front breaks more then rear breaks, because the uses front breaks more.
Yes-general rule for hydraulic brakes-start at the wheel furthest from the master cylinder(usually passenger rear) then move to next driver rear,front passenger side and finally drivers sidefront.
Of course. All vehicles have front & rear brakes.
Front brakes have significantly more stopping power than rear brakes.
The front and rear brakes are both made of ceramic. i bought front and rear brakes on eBay for $80 total.
just replace the rear brakes
Front pads (disc brakes) Rear shoes (drum brakes)