No. It is unlikely the court will allow a faxed copy into evidence. Courts need to view the original so it can be confirmed the document wasn't altered before being copied. One of the first things visible in an altered document is a difference in the pen that was used. That difference doesn't come through in a facsimile or copy.
The result may be different if you can prove the parties agreed to honor facsimiles at the time the agreement was executed.
No. It is unlikely the court will allow a faxed copy into evidence. Courts need to view the original so it can be confirmed the document wasn't altered before being copied. One of the first things visible in an altered document is a difference in the pen that was used. That difference doesn't come through in a facsimile or copy.
The result may be different if you can prove the parties agreed to honor facsimiles at the time the agreement was executed.
No. It is unlikely the court will allow a faxed copy into evidence. Courts need to view the original so it can be confirmed the document wasn't altered before being copied. One of the first things visible in an altered document is a difference in the pen that was used. That difference doesn't come through in a facsimile or copy.
The result may be different if you can prove the parties agreed to honor facsimiles at the time the agreement was executed.
No. It is unlikely the court will allow a faxed copy into evidence. Courts need to view the original so it can be confirmed the document wasn't altered before being copied. One of the first things visible in an altered document is a difference in the pen that was used. That difference doesn't come through in a facsimile or copy.
The result may be different if you can prove the parties agreed to honor facsimiles at the time the agreement was executed.
No. It is unlikely the court will allow a faxed copy into evidence. Courts need to view the original so it can be confirmed the document wasn't altered before being copied. One of the first things visible in an altered document is a difference in the pen that was used. That difference doesn't come through in a facsimile or copy.
The result may be different if you can prove the parties agreed to honor facsimiles at the time the agreement was executed.
No, faxed signatures cannot be notarized or considered as valid and/or "legal" unless they can be witnessed in person. How do you REALLY know the person on the other end of the fax (or e-mail) is REALLY who they say they are?
It all depends on what you will be using it for. A facsimile is not accepted for recording in most land records offices. Some judges will not accept a faxed copy of a document, such as a promissory note or check with a notation on the memo line. Many contracts are faxed but the parties should agree ahead of time and the faxed copies that go back and forth should contain a clause that they will be binding although faxed.
Generally that is up to the parties and it depends on what documents you are referring to. For example, if the parties agree to fax a signed purchase and sale agreement and expressed no concern at the time, it would be enforceable in court. A faxed deed would not be considered a legal document and would not be accepted for recording purposes in most jurisdictions.Generally that is up to the parties and it depends on what documents you are referring to. For example, if the parties agree to fax a signed purchase and sale agreement and expressed no concern at the time, it would be enforceable in court. A faxed deed would not be considered a legal document and would not be accepted for recording purposes in most jurisdictions.Generally that is up to the parties and it depends on what documents you are referring to. For example, if the parties agree to fax a signed purchase and sale agreement and expressed no concern at the time, it would be enforceable in court. A faxed deed would not be considered a legal document and would not be accepted for recording purposes in most jurisdictions.Generally that is up to the parties and it depends on what documents you are referring to. For example, if the parties agree to fax a signed purchase and sale agreement and expressed no concern at the time, it would be enforceable in court. A faxed deed would not be considered a legal document and would not be accepted for recording purposes in most jurisdictions.
Aflac ins faxed claim forms
Your question lacks detail so the following is general information.It depends on the document and where it needs to be legally binding. Faxed documents are becoming more and more common and if they need to be used in court a faxed signature may be vulnerable depending on the issues. An original signature is always preferable. Some land records offices will not accept a faxed document for recording unless it is an exhibit to an originally signed document.Regarding legal documents in general there is no general rule. Good business dictates that if faxed documents are to be relied upon and the intent is for parties to be bound by those documents a separate statement to that effect should be made part of the package and clearly expresses in the documents.
The past tense is faxed.
no
false
a fax document is a document that has been sent over a fax machine.
yes, preferably 14 points
No, except at the beginning of a sentence because it is n ot a proper n ou n.
Contact the human resources department.