The Clovis Period. It could alse be described as the Dark Ages.
Charlemagne
This varied. Sometimes they got along. Sometimes the rulers were stronger, and sometimes the church was. For example, at one time, in the eleventh and twelfth centuries, when the kings and emperors felt they had the right to appoint people to be bishops at the cathedrals in their kingdoms, and the popes disagreed, the result was the Investiture Controversy, which ended in 1122. In another example, there was a controversy over who should be pope, with different kings siding with different people claiming to be popes; this was called the Papal Schism and lasted from 1378 to 1417. But there were also times when the church got into the affairs of the kings. A king could be put under papal interdict, which meant that he was excommunicated, but also the church no longer required people to hold to the oaths made to the king, and other kings could invade his land without fear of censure. This happened to a number of kings, notably King John of England. Another interesting example, quite different from the above, was the relationship between Charlemagne and Pope Leo III. Pope Leo was adamantly opposed by the nobility of Rome because he was of common origin, and they wanted a pope from their own class. He was attacked by a large mob and taken prisoner with the intention that they would blind him and tear his tongue out. He was rescued, but his position was very precarious. Charlemagne went to his aid, and gave him protection. Leo, supposedly without Charlemagne's foreknowledge, crowned Charlemagne Emperor of the West during the mass on Christmas Day in 800.
Because of defense and kings also want to be the best Also Castles were important to with stand attack during times of war. And... Because they were DA BOMB MANG!
Poland fairly disappeared from the map of Europe during Catherine the Great's reign. She took most of it on the three times it was divided.
No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.No. At the time of the monarchy, the kings were not worshiped, in fact the Romans hated he kings. Julius Caesar was the first Roman leader to be deified, followed by the emperors and many times their wives.
Two other groups who held power during these times were religious leaders and wealthy merchants.
it was King Stall and Queen Sally
the renaissance was more of a revolution there were more scientific discoveries and it was time of great knowledge mainly during the medieval times it was more of "kings and queens serfdom during the renaissance they were eliminating serfdom"
The Middle Ages happened in Europe over a period of a thousand years. There were hundreds of countries and thousands of kings during that time.Perhaps the best known king in the Middle Ages was Charlemagne. William the Conqueror is also well known. Another famous king was Richard the Lionhearted. The lists just go on and on.
Kings of All Times was created in 1999.
Yes, during the centuries of the Judges and Kings. During Second Temple times there were Jews and non-Jews in Israel (Judea).
Military service to feudal lords or kings during medieval period.
Only in movies do kings have people who "announce" them. When someone came to a holding they knew who they were meeting by the time they entered the great hall.
Kings reigned from castles, presiding over disputes among their subjects. They also protected both king and people during times of war in a kingdom.
reflect the rough times during the great depression, generally pretty depresing paintings ;-)
Charlemagne
This varied. Sometimes they got along. Sometimes the rulers were stronger, and sometimes the church was. For example, at one time, in the eleventh and twelfth centuries, when the kings and emperors felt they had the right to appoint people to be bishops at the cathedrals in their kingdoms, and the popes disagreed, the result was the Investiture Controversy, which ended in 1122. In another example, there was a controversy over who should be pope, with different kings siding with different people claiming to be popes; this was called the Papal Schism and lasted from 1378 to 1417. But there were also times when the church got into the affairs of the kings. A king could be put under papal interdict, which meant that he was excommunicated, but also the church no longer required people to hold to the oaths made to the king, and other kings could invade his land without fear of censure. This happened to a number of kings, notably King John of England. Another interesting example, quite different from the above, was the relationship between Charlemagne and Pope Leo III. Pope Leo was adamantly opposed by the nobility of Rome because he was of common origin, and they wanted a pope from their own class. He was attacked by a large mob and taken prisoner with the intention that they would blind him and tear his tongue out. He was rescued, but his position was very precarious. Charlemagne went to his aid, and gave him protection. Leo, supposedly without Charlemagne's foreknowledge, crowned Charlemagne Emperor of the West during the mass on Christmas Day in 800.