Well, sometimes, especially to be a noble because to be a knight, the horses and armor was expensive, and most serfs lacked skill, but some serfs did become knights.
Nobles... Well, even if you had lots of money in that time period, you couldn't always be a noble. Nobles were from rich families and they had almost always had been rich, especially very rich nobles, but they could sometimes get high jobs, with the money, probably, and be a noble.
You're welcome! ;)
It was rare for a serf to become a knight or noble, as social mobility was limited in feudal societies. Becoming a knight usually required training from a young age, access to resources, and lineage. However, there are a few examples of serfs rising in status through exceptional skill, service, or deeds.
The serf worked in the fields all day, bound to the land and serving the lord of the manor.
The serf worked tirelessly in the fields for his lord, without hope of escaping his feudal obligations.
Serfs typically worked from sunrise to sunset, which could amount to around 10-12 hours a day, depending on the season and specific feudal system they were a part of.
A freeman was a person who was not bound to the land or obligated to provide labor to a lord, while a serf was a person who was bound to the land and required to provide labor to a lord in exchange for protection. Freemen had more freedom and autonomy compared to serfs who had limited rights and mobility.
A vassal is a free person who enters into a mutual agreement with a lord to provide military or other services in exchange for land, while a serf is a peasant who is bound to the land and obligated to work for a lord in exchange for protection and security. Vassals have more autonomy and legal rights compared to serfs.
1) If a serf could run away for a year and one day, it was considered free. 2) if the noble gave the serf permission, it could stop working on the land
Nobles were aristocrats with power, wealth, and land ownership, while serfs were peasants bound to the land and subject to the authority of the nobles. Nobles had social status, legal privileges, and often lived in luxurious conditions, while serfs had limited rights, were tied to the land they worked on, and lived in poverty.
The noble executed the serf.
You couldn't. Where you were born is where you stayed. Born a serf stayed a serf, born a peasant stayed a peasant, born noble stayed noble. Nobles could move to some extent if they pleased the crown, but that was it.
Later in Midievil Life a knight had to provide for his own arms, armor, horses and retainers and money-based economies became more common. Rich peasants and merchants began angling for the title of knight as well. In 13th century England, if a man was free and could take up arms and pay the "knight's fee," he was eligible to become a knight.:D Vigorously awesome.
Serfs become fat when they eat pigs because that was all they could afford.
A peasant or serf could become a free man if: - he married a free woman - he ran away and wasn't found for a year He could also become a lord if he married a lady
No, a serf was a good deal lower than a knight. A serf was an agricultural worker who was bound to the land he lived on and was not allowed to leave it. A serf was not a slave, because he could not be purchased or sold, but he was also not free to leave the place where he lived. The knights were the lowest level of nobility. They were at a higher status than freemen, who were at a higher status than serfs.
A serf was a peasant who worked on a noble's land in exchange for protection and the use of land. The noble owned the land and had power and authority over the serfs who lived and worked on it.
You are not a serf.
No. Serf does mean slave, but in the middle ages they weren't sold. They could be sent to another holding and made to provide services to another noble, but it was more like they were on loan.
Sir Knight or Sir (name)