Want this question answered?
After a long and heated battle between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the Constitution versus the Articles of Confederation and the inclusion of the Bill of Rights, a Constitution was written and ratified by all 13 colonies.
The biggest difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Virginia plan was the power of votes. In the articles each state had a representative with one vote, the Virginia Plan was based on representation decided by a state's population.
The Articles of Confederation had the power to settle disputes between states, but let the states make their own constitution/laws
Many Federalists advocated for the creation of a new government because they thought that the Articles of Confederation did not give the makeshift federal government enough power to maintain a cohesive nation. For instance under the Articles, the federal government could not levy taxes or regulate any sort of relations between the states. Every state had the right to print its own money which created a huge number of problems with inflation and banking. To fix these problems, Federalists wanted a new, more powerful federal government, hence their Federalist moniker.
they both are vey inprotant
After a long and heated battle between the Federalists and Anti-Federalists over the Constitution versus the Articles of Confederation and the inclusion of the Bill of Rights, a Constitution was written and ratified by all 13 colonies.
After the Articles of Confederation were written, there were problems with it. Confederationists thought that the Articles were a fine way to run the country, but the nationalists did not. They favored a stronger national government than the one the Articles provided. Later, the founding fathers wrote the constitution, but there were some problems getting it ratified, or passed. This is where federalists and anti-federalists came into play. Anti-federalists were against the constitution, and in case you haven't already guessed, most ant-federalists were confederationists to start off. Federalists were all for the ratification of the constitution of the United States.
The Articles of Confederation were made before the Constitution. The Articles of Confederation was lacking in many things such as balance between states, taxes, and how to ratify amendments. The Constitution solved all of these problems.
The biggest difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Virginia plan was the power of votes. In the articles each state had a representative with one vote, the Virginia Plan was based on representation decided by a state's population.
congress under the articles of confederation could not congress under the articles of confederation could not
by the bill of rights
idek
The Articles of Confederation had the power to settle disputes between states, but let the states make their own constitution/laws
Many Federalists advocated for the creation of a new government because they thought that the Articles of Confederation did not give the makeshift federal government enough power to maintain a cohesive nation. For instance under the Articles, the federal government could not levy taxes or regulate any sort of relations between the states. Every state had the right to print its own money which created a huge number of problems with inflation and banking. To fix these problems, Federalists wanted a new, more powerful federal government, hence their Federalist moniker.
It was made of cheese.
they both are vey inprotant
Americans wanted a stronger government than the Articles of Confederation provided for a number of reasons. The Articles of Confederation lacked the necessary powers to govern effectively leaving it unable to enforce laws collect taxes or provide for a unified military. The Articles of Confederation also did not have any means of resolving disputes between the states. Furthermore the Articles of Confederation did not have a strong executive branch and could not create a unified currency. Finally the Articles of Confederation did not allow for the direct participation of citizens in the government and it was difficult to amend the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation lacked the necessary powers to govern effectively leaving it unable to enforce laws collect taxes or provide for a unified military. The Articles of Confederation did not have any means of resolving disputes between the states. The Articles of Confederation did not have a strong executive branch and could not create a unified currency. The Articles of Confederation did not allow for the direct participation of citizens in the government and it was difficult to amend the Articles of Confederation.These shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation led Americans to seek a stronger more effective government that could better meet the needs of the nation.