0
determine whether it is argument or not argument Write the premises and conclusion separately?
1) economics should never have sought to divorce itself from the other social sciences and can advance only in conjunction with them. 2)The discipline of economics has yet to get over its childish passion for mathematics and for purely theoretical and often highly ideological speculation 3) Economists are all too often preoccupied with petty mathematical problems of interest only to themselves .?
Kinfu Fisseha
Details are not given the care they deserve: crucial claims are vaguely stated, significant different formulations are treated as though they were equivalent, examples are under-described, arguments are gestured at rather than properly made, their form is left unexplained, and so on. [...] Philosophy has never been done for an extended period according to standards as high as those that are now already available, if only the profession will take them seriously to heart. The "crude stereotypes" that Williamson refers to in the above passage are these: that analytic philosophers produce carefully argued and rigorous analyses of trivially small philosophic puzzles, while continental philosophers produce profound and substantial results but only by deducing them from broad philosophical systems which themselves lack supporting arguments or clarity in their expression
Jonathon Witting
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Is an argument valid or invalid?
An argument is valid if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. It is invalid if the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.
A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?
True. A valid argument can have a false conclusion if the premises logically lead to that conclusion even though it is not true. Validity in logic refers to the structure of the argument, regardless of the truth or falsity of the premises or conclusion.
What are the two parts of an argument?
The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.
How do you add a premises and conclusion to incomplete argument?
You will have to make a logical inference for the premises, and a logical deduction for the conclusion.
What is the difference between valid and sound in a argument?
In logic, a valid argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises. A sound argument is a valid argument with true premises. So, a sound argument is not only valid, but it also has true premises, making it both logically correct and factually accurate.
How do you add a premises and conclusion to incomplete argument?
You will have to make a logical inference for the premises, and a logical deduction for the conclusion.
A valid argument can have a false conclusion True or False?
True. A valid argument can have a false conclusion if the premises logically lead to that conclusion even though it is not true. Validity in logic refers to the structure of the argument, regardless of the truth or falsity of the premises or conclusion.
How do you identify a strong or weak argument?
A strong argument is supported by reasoning and evidence, is logically sound, and addresses counterarguments effectively. A weak argument lacks evidence, relies on emotion or fallacious reasoning, or fails to address opposing views adequately. It's important to evaluate the validity of the premises, the logical structure, and the relevance of the evidence when determining the strength of an argument.
What is a deductive argument?
A deductive argument is a logical reasoning process where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premise. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. It is a form of reasoning that aims to provide logically conclusive evidence for the conclusion.
What is the difference between valid and sound in a argument?
In logic, a valid argument is one where the conclusion logically follows from the premises. A sound argument is a valid argument with true premises. So, a sound argument is not only valid, but it also has true premises, making it both logically correct and factually accurate.
Can a sound argument have a false conclusion?
A sound argument cannot have a false conclusion. A sound argument refers to a deductive argument which is valid and has all true premises, therefore its conclusion cannot be false.
What is deductive argument?
A deductive argument is a logical reasoning process where the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. If the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Deductive arguments are characterized by their validity, meaning that the conclusion cannot be false if the premises are true.
What are Truth Validity and Soundness?
In Debate, specifically in a logical argument, Truth is a premise that corresponds to the way the world actually is. Validity in an argument is that if the premises are true, then so is the conclusion (it is possible for the arguments to be valid even if the premises are false). Soundness is when the premises is true and the argument is valid. To reiterate, arguments cannot be true (only statements can be true), but they can be valid and sound. When an statement is true it goes along with the way the world really is. When an argument is valid, then the premises and the conclusion are logically connected in such a way that if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. Saying an argument is valid does not guarantee that the premises are true. When an argument is sound, the premises are true and the argument is valid, so the conclusion must also be true.
What is an invalid argument?
In invalid argument is one in which the premises do not necessitate the truth of the conclusion. An argument's validity or invalidity does NOT depend on the actual truth of the premises, just what they would entail IF they are true.
Can an argument with a true premises and true conclusion be invalid?
Yes. It could be a coincidence that the premises and conclusion are all true. For example, here is an argument: 1. It is true that if a person belongs to the Republican Party they must be an American. 2. Mitt Romney is an American. 3. Therefore, the conclusion is that Mitt Romney is a Republican. Although both premises and the conclusion are true, the argument is not valid. That is because it is possible to imagine an argument in this form where the premises were true, but the conclusion is not. (Imagine if the second premise were "Barack Obama is an American" which is true, leading to the conclusion "Barack Obama is a Republican" which is false.)
What makes an argument an argument?
An argument is inductive when it is based on probability, such as statistics. In an inductive argument, if the premises are true, the conclusion is probably true.
How Can a strong inductive argument have a false conclusion?
Since an inductive argument is an argument where the truth of the premises make it reasonable to hold that the conclusion is true, it does not necessarily guarantee it, meaning you could have a false conclusion.
