No, it was man named Democritus. Aristotle believed the opposite, actually. He believed in a contiguous matter theory.
particles
Elementary (fundamental) particles have not components; other particles (as protons and neutrons) are composed from other particles.
Currently quarks are believed to be fundamental particles, and as such are not composed of anything.
electron has no quarks. both electrons and quarks are fundamental particles and are composed only of themselves.
No. A gluon, however, can be thought of as one. It's the particle that holds quarks together inside of hadrons (particles composed of three quarks) and mesons (particles composed of a quark-antiquark pair). The gluon is called a gauge boson- a fundamental particle that mediates one of the fundamental forces. Glucose is a type of sugar.
Protons and neutrons are found in the nucleus. While these are theoretically composed of quarks (conversely even more massive particles), quarks do not exist in a free state so are not "fundamental particles" by definition.
Protons and neutrons are hadrons; they are made of quarks. Protons are composed of two up quarks and a down quark, while neutrons are composed of one up quark and two down quarks. The quarks are held together by gluons. Electrons are not composed of more fundamental particles; they are categorized as leptons.they are made up of quarks
Yes. Molecules are composed of atoms. Atoms are composed of particles.
Mesons are part of the Hadron group along with Baryons, and are subatomic particles composed of one quark and one antiquark. (Baryons being composed of three quarks.) Quarks and leptons are elementary particles, and that is the fundamental difference.
We are composed from particles.
Atoms, which are in turn composed of sub-atomic particles.
.the atoms is composed of three -------- particles .the atom has a --------------- and an electron could